Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lady Freethinker

Nonprofit organization furthering compassion for all species.

$331k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$302kHuman Services$28kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$10kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $121,076 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $330,954 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $209,878 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $88k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LADY FREETHINKER$27,741
CHAINFREE KNOXVILLE$10,058
REZDAWG RESCUE$10,000
LAW N' PAWS$10,000
ZIGGY'S REFUGE FARM SANCTUARY$10,000
ALACHUA COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HO$10,000
RESCATE FENIX$10,000
PAWS FOR COMPASSION$9,877
BEACH DOG RESCUE OF COSTA MAYA MEXI$8,700
HAPPY COMPROMISE FARM SANCTUARY$8,700
COMPASSIONATE LIVING$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALACHUA COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HO: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
NY
IN
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
OK
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $156k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$57k · 36% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: STR ANIMAL CARE · VET CARE-ANIMALS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$56k · 36% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SHELTER-ANIMALS · VET CARE-ANIMALS

East Asia and the Pacific$27k · 17% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: VET CARE-ANIMALS · VET CARE-MONKEYS

Sub-Saharan Africa$10k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: VET CARE-ANIMALS

Middle East and North Africa$8k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: VET CARE-ANIMALS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 68% of Lady Freethinker’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 12% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Lady Freethinkerlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$169k · 5 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$169k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    Romanian League in Defense of Animals
    2× · 2021–2022 · $34k · revenue ×59
  • LN
    LAW N PAWS
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +412%
  • HC
    HAPPY COMPROMISE FARM AND SANCTUARY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • WO
    WORLD OF ANGELS FOUNDATION WOA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +79%
  • SI
    SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -18%
  • AR
    ARLEE REHABILITATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
3
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
4
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
5
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
6
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
7
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
8
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
9
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
10
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
11
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rezdawg Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ziggys Refuge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Romanian League in Defense of Animals — $33,627 · AnimalsRomanian League in Defense of AnimalsLAW N PAWS — $20,000 · AnimalsLAW N PAWSWORLD OF ANGELS FOUNDATION WOA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · AnimalsWORLD OF ANGELS FOUNDATION WOA FOUNDATIONHAPPY COMPROMISE FARM AND SANCTUARY — $18,700 · AnimalsHAPPY COMPROMISE FARM AND SANCTUARYBEACH DOG RESCUE OF COSTA MAYA MEXICO INC — $16,700 · AnimalsBEACH DOG RESCUE OF COSTA MAYA MEXICO INCSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,329 · AnimalsSPCA INTERNATIONAL INCChainFree USA — $10,058 · AnimalsCIRCLE A HOME FOR HORSES INC — $10,000 · AnimalsZIGGYS REFUGE — $10,000 · AnimalsTHREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE — $10,000 · AnimalsREZDAWG RESCUE INC — $10,000 · AnimalsRESCATE FENIX — $10,000 · AnimalsSTEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,000 · Animals+1 more — $6,000 · AnimalsSAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INC — $79,839 · OtherSAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INCLADY FREETHINKER — $27,741 · OtherLADY FREETHINKERASOCIACION PRO ALBERGUE DE ANIMALES INC — $10,000 · OtherASOCIACION PRO ALBERGUE DE ANIMALES INCPAWS FOR COMPASSION - US — $9,877 · OtherPAWS FOR COMPASSION - USRivers Wish Animal Sanctuary — $7,225 · OtherRivers Wish Animal SanctuaryARLEE REHABILITATION CENTER — $10,000 · HealthPLEDGELING FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyALACHUA COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS AND HUNGRY INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Animals$195,414Other$134,682Health$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INC — $79,839 over 3y, 16% of budgetRomanian League in Defense of Animals — $33,627 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetLAW N PAWS — $20,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetWORLD OF ANGELS FOUNDATION WOA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHAPPY COMPROMISE FARM AND SANCTUARY — $18,700 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBEACH DOG RESCUE OF COSTA MAYA MEXICO INC — $16,700 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,329 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChainFree USA — $10,058 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetARLEE REHABILITATION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCIRCLE A HOME FOR HORSES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetZIGGYS REFUGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREZDAWG RESCUE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALACHUA COUNTY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS AND HUNGRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASOCIACION PRO ALBERGUE DE ANIMALES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRESCATE FENIX — $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetRivers Wish Animal Sanctuary — $7,225 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSTEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $7,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCompassionate Living — $6,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Greater Good Charities · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lady Freethinker funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 33%
  • Alachua County Coalition for the Homeless and Hungry Inc33% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lady Freethinker?

Find your warmest path to Lady Freethinker through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph