Skip to content
Laborers Union Local 110 at a glance

· Public charity

Laborers Union Local 110

Operation of local union

$338k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Public Benefit$75kCivil Rights$43kHuman Services$38kCommunity Improvement$30kPhilanthropy$27kHealth$24kArts & Culture$14kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $102,560, the rows itemized in this filing. The $337,795 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $235,235 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTIC VOTER ACTION$25,000
ARCHWAY INSTITUTE$11,000
GUNS N HOSES$10,000
SMALL BUSINESS EMPOWERMENT CENTER$10,000
CONSTRUCTION FORUM$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$9,160
ST LOUIS COUNTY NAACP$7,500
HISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF ST LOUIS$7,000
BREAD & ROSES MISSOURI$6,500
ST LOUIS COUNTY POLICE WEFARE ASSOCIATION$6,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%GUNS N HOSES: $11k → 11%GUNS N HOSES: $10k → 11%CONSTRUCTION FORUM: $10k → 21%CONSTRUCTION FORUM: $10k → 21%ST LOUIS COUNTY POLICE WEFARE ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 8 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$204k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ARCHWAY INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue +6%
  • SL
    St Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association
    2× · 2024–2025 · $21k · revenue +50%
  • HL
    HISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • 5F
    5 FOR THE FIGHT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • RU
    REGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • LI
    LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Workers Education Society

The St. Louis Workers Education Society (WES) educates and trains St. Louis residents, especially people of color, women and youth, to become community leaders. Our focus is on the intersection of workers rights, racial justice, sexual and…

Human Services
2
Missouri Afl-Cio

Assist in furthering policies of the national labor association, monitoring employment legislation, and providing related education to the organization membership.

—
3
St Louis Tax Assistance Progr
Human Services
4
St Louis Police Leadership Organization

Provide social and fraternal activities and represent the interests of the supervisors and commanders of the st louis metropolitan police department.

—
5
Worksite Wellness Council of Louisville
Health
6
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
7
St Louis Council of Construction Consumers

The slc3 is a community of design and construction industry professionals with a common interest in the betterment of our region through prioritizing innovation, continuing education, equity empowerment and all-inclusive workforce…

Community Improvement
8
Missouri Workers Center

Missouri Workers Center is building a multiracial worker-led movement to advance the rights and power of workers on and off the job in rural, urban, and suburban Missouri.

Employment
9
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
10
Small Business Empowerment Fund Cdfi

A community development financial institution or community development finance institution - abbreviated in both cases to CDFI - is a financial institution that provides credit and financial services to underserved markets and populations,…

Community Improvement
11
Leadership Council Southwestern Illinois

Uniting the southwestern illinois and greater st. louis region for economic growth

—
12
Missouri Workers Power

Our mission is to advocate for a just and equitable economy where poor and working people make more of the decisions that affect their daily lives. Through civic engagement, political advocacy, and issue-based voter education and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater St Louis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Regional Union Construction Centerinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE VOTER ACTION: $75,000 · Civil RightsMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE VOTER ACTIONHISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $17,000 · Civil RightsHISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF GREATER ST LO…NAACP ST LOUIS COUNTY: $15,750 · OtherNAACP ST LOUIS COUNTY5 FOR THE FIGHT: $10,000 · Other5 FOR THE FIGHTLABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherLABORERS' INTERNATIONA…TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTERENCE J O'SULLIVAN L…ARNOLD FOOD PANTRY: $6,115 · OtherARNOLD FOOD PANTRYSt Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association: $21,150 · Human ServicesSt Louis Guns N Hose…CONSTRUCTION FORUM: $20,000 · Human ServicesCONSTRUCTION FORUMST LOUIS COUNTY POLICE WELFARE ASSOC: $6,400 · Human ServicesST LOUIS COUNTY POLI…ARCHWAY INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS: $24,100 · HealthARCHWAY IN…SMALL BUSINESS EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $10,000 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $16,720 · PhilanthropyBREAD & ROSES MISSOURI: $14,000 · Arts & Culture
Civil Rights$92,000Other$51,865Human Services$47,550Health$24,100Community Improvement$20,000Philanthropy$16,720Arts & Culture$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE VOTER ACTION: $75,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetARCHWAY INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS: $24,100 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSt Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association: $21,150 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCONSTRUCTION FORUM: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $17,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $16,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD & ROSES MISSOURI: $14,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSMALL BUSINESS EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARNOLD FOOD PANTRY: $6,115 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laborers Union Local 110 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laborers Union Local 110. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laborers Union Local 110’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home