· Public charity
Laborers Union Local 110
Operation of local union
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $102,560 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $337,795 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $235,235 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTIC VOTER ACTION | $25,000 |
| ARCHWAY INSTITUTE | $11,000 |
| SMALL BUSINESS EMPOWERMENT CENTER | $10,000 |
| CONSTRUCTION FORUM | $10,000 |
| GUNS N HOSES | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS | $9,160 |
| ST LOUIS COUNTY NAACP | $7,500 |
| HISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF ST LOUIS | $7,000 |
| BREAD & ROSES MISSOURI | $6,500 |
| ST LOUIS COUNTY POLICE WEFARE ASSOCIATION | $6,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MJMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE VOTER ACTION2× · 2024–2025 · $75k · revenue 0%
- AIARCHWAY INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue 0%
- SLSt Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association2× · 2024–2025 · $21k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- LILABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICAone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +21%
- RUREGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- 5F5 FOR THE FIGHTone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The St. Louis Workers Education Society (WES) educates and trains St. Louis residents, especially people of color, women and youth, to become community leaders. Our focus is on the intersection of workers rights, racial justice, sexual and…
Assist in furthering policies of the national labor association, monitoring employment legislation, and providing related education to the organization membership.
Provide social and fraternal activities and represent the interests of the supervisors and commanders of the st louis metropolitan police department.
The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…
The slc3 is a community of design and construction industry professionals with a common interest in the betterment of our region through prioritizing innovation, continuing education, equity empowerment and all-inclusive workforce…
Missouri Workers Center is building a multiracial worker-led movement to advance the rights and power of workers on and off the job in rural, urban, and suburban Missouri.
Economic development.
A community development financial institution or community development finance institution - abbreviated in both cases to CDFI - is a financial institution that provides credit and financial services to underserved markets and populations,…
Uniting the southwestern illinois and greater st. louis region for economic growth
Our mission is to advocate for a just and equitable economy where poor and working people make more of the decisions that affect their daily lives. Through civic engagement, political advocacy, and issue-based voter education and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater St Louis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Regional Union Construction Centerinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE VOTER ACTION ↗
- Who funds ARCHWAY INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE DISORDERS ↗
- Who funds St Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION FORUM ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC LEADERS GROUP OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD & ROSES MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SMALL BUSINESS EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC ↗
- Who funds TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS COUNTY POLICE WELFARE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds ARNOLD FOOD PANTRY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laborers Union Local 110 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.