Skip to content

Missouri · Public charity

Laborers Union Local 110

Operation of local union

$338k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Itemized grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$103k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$25,000
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$38M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Public Benefit$75kCivil Rights$43kHuman Services$38kCommunity Improvement$30kPhilanthropy$27kHealth$24kArts & Culture$14kEmployment$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Laborers Union Local 110 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMissouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action: $75,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetArchway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders: $24,100 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSt Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association: $21,150 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetConstruction Forum: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHispanic Leaders Group of Greater St Louis: $17,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetUnited Way of Greater St Louis Inc: $16,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBread & Roses Missouri: $14,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSmall Business Empowerment Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRegional Union Construction Centerinc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLaborers' International Union of North America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTerence J O'Sullivan Liuna Charitable Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetArnold Food Pantry: $6,115 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Laborers Union Local 110 with peer funders

About Laborers Union Local 110

How much does Laborers Union Local 110 give?
Laborers Union Local 110 reported 10 itemized grants totaling $102,560, out of $337,795 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Laborers Union Local 110 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (28%), Civil Rights (16%), Human Services (14%).
Who are Laborers Union Local 110's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action ($75k), Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders ($24k), St Louis Guns N Hoses Boxing Association ($21k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Laborers Union Local 110?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include St Louis Community Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Laborers Union Local 110 based?
Laborers Union Local 110 is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laborers Union Local 110’s filings →

More from the funding graph