Skip to content

· Public charity

Laborers International Union of Local Union 270

Improve welfare and working conditions of workers through job dispatch, representation, and education of members.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$480kPublic Benefit$58kHealth$47kRecreation & Sports$47kHuman Services$39kCivil Rights$20kEmployment$15k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $117,724, the rows itemized in this filing. The $124,768 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,044 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN CA LABORERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$20,000
Las 7 Regiones$17,424
CHRISTMAS IN THE PARK$15,300
LIUNA LATINO CAUCUS$15,000
LOCAL 300 SCHOLARSHIP FUND$15,000
San Jose State University$12,000
Santa Clara University$6,000
GILROY RODEO ASSOCIATION$6,000
SIREN$5,500
Mike Quevedo Sr Scholarship Fund$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIREN: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$761k · 11 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$761k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+257%

Still filing today

82%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsEmploymentHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    Laborers Local 270 Scholarship Committee
    3× · 2018–2020 · $170k · revenue +28% · 100% of their budget
  • NC
    Northern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $162k · revenue +71%
  • LL
    LABORERS' LOCAL 300 SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    6× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AC
    AGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +257%
  • IL
    INSTITUTO LABORAL DE LA RAZA
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • AG
    ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacramento Central Labor Council

To benefit local trade unions and their members through education and promotion of union labor to the public.

—
2
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
3
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
4
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
5
California Employers Association

Provide all member employers with current human resource and California labor law information.

—
6
North Valley Labor Federation

The North Valley Labor Federations mission is to grow and strengthen the labor movement and build a strong political voice for working families in the Northern San Joaquin Valley.

—
7
Southern California Contractors Association

To promote and represent union contractors, inform them about issues affecting the industry and provide the members with support services and peer networks that will help them to succeed.

—
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Ua Local 38 Scholarship Trust Fund of San Francisco Marin Sonoma Mendocino

The fund was established by the terms of a trust agreement for the purpose of providing scholarships for attendance in colleges or universities by dependents of eligible participants in this multiemployer plan.

Membership Benefit
10
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
11
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

—
12
Santa Clara County Construction Careers Association

Provide services and information that promotes career opportunities in the construction industry.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Jose News Bureau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Laborers Local 270 Scholarship Committee: $170,305 · EducationLaborers Local 270 Scholarship CommitteeNorthern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation: $161,600 · EducationNorthern California Laborers Scholarship FoundationLABORERS' LOCAL 300 SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $63,000 · EducationLABORERS' LOCAL 300 SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $17,000 · Education+2 more: $17,500 · EducationLABORERS LOCAL 270 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $135,570 · OtherLABORERS LOCAL 270 COMMUNITY …LIUNA LATINO CAUCUS: $35,000 · OtherLIUNA LATINO CAUCUSLas 7 Regiones: $17,424 · OtherLas 7 RegionesSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITYINSTITUTO LABORAL DE LA RAZA: $7,500 · Other+1 more: $5,360 · OtherCHRISTMAS IN THE PARK: $32,900 · Recreation & SportsGILROY RODEO ASSOCIATION: $29,595 · Recreation & SportsSan Jose News Bureau: $57,500 · Arts & CultureWorking Partnerships USA: $47,000 · HealthAGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EmploymentSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $5,500 · Human Services
Education$429,405Other$212,854Recreation & Sports$62,495Arts & Culture$57,500Health$47,000Employment$7,500Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLaborers Local 270 Scholarship Committee: $170,305 over 3y, 100% of budgetNorthern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation: $161,600 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetLABORERS' LOCAL 300 SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $63,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetSan Jose News Bureau: $57,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWorking Partnerships USA: $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN THE PARK: $32,900 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGILROY RODEO ASSOCIATION: $29,595 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $17,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLIUNA PACIFIC SOUTHWEST EDUCATION AND EVENTS FUND: $11,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $5,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan IncCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laborers International Union of Local Union 270 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laborers International Union of Local Union 270. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laborers International Union of Local Union 270?

    Find your warmest path to Laborers International Union of Local Union 270 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laborers International Union of Local Union 270’s filings →

    More from the funding graph