Skip to content

· Private foundation

La Luz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$333kArts & Culture$44kHuman Services$26kInternational$20kEducation$19kEnvironment$5kHousing & Shelter$4kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $176k
$18,899
Median grant
1
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION$176,000
MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA$27,003
UNITED BY FRIENDSHIP$20,000
LIFE CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER$18,899
THE SANTA FE OPERA$3,500
ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO$1,500
NEW MEXICO MISSION OF MERCY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Haven of Hope: $3k → 16%The Lensic Performing Arts Center: $3k → 12%NEW MEXICO MISSION OF MERCY: $1k → 14%UNITED BY FRIENDSHIP: $20k → 18%NM Highland University Foundation: $5k → 23%National Parks Arts Foundation: $500 → 14%GIRLS INC: $2k → 12%New Mexico Wildlife Center: $3k → 18%THE LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $2k → 12%MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA: $27k → 18%ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO: $2k → 12%MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA: $4k → 18%Girls Inc: $500 → 12%NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $176k → 12%NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $130k → 12%LIFE CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $19k → 12%Rio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $16k → 12%Santa Fe Prep School: $10k → 12%Rio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $6k → 12%SANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%LIFE CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $3k → 12%Rio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $3k → 12%SANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%THE SANTA FE OPERA: $4k → 12%Rio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $500 → 12%THE SANTA FE OPERA: $4k → 12%Rio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $380 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$407k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+1118%

Still filing today

67%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $306k · revenue +15% · 32% of their budget
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    2× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +27%
  • LP
    LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • SF
    Santa Fe Prep School
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NH
    NM Highland University Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue ×12
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
2
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
3
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
4
Santa Fe Youth Symphony Incorporated

Our Mission is to inspire and engage the youth of Northern New Mexico's multicultural communities through excellent music education, the guidance of music professionals, and performance opportunities from small ensemble to full orchestra…

—
5
New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc

The mission of the new mexico rural electric cooperatives (nmrec) is to advance protect and advocate member interests.

—
6
Santa Fe Conservation Trust

The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…

Environment
7
Encore Entertainment Inc

Provide performing arts events for southeast new mexico.

—
8
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
9
Wise Fool New Mexico

It is Wise Fool New Mexicos mission to ignite the imagination, build community, and promote social justice through performances and hands-on experiences in the arts of circus, puppetry, and theater.

Arts & Culture
10
Rio Soccer Club

Providing youth soccer training, developmental training, and small-sided soccer experience to appoximately 1,250 youth in the state of new mexico.

Recreation & Sports
11
Santa Fe Playhouse

Santa fe playhouse creates community on stage and off by holding space for unexpected conversations through intriguing and vital programming. we create community by: -connecting artists with audiences through theatre. this includes: new…

Arts & Culture
12
Santa Fe Indian School

Provide educational and residential opportunities for native american children in grades 7-12.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adaptive Sports Program New Mexico Inc; the most unlike its peers is United by Friendship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $306,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION+1 more: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsRio Rapids Northern Soccer Club: $25,743 · OtherRio Rapids Northern…LIFE CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $21,899 · OtherLIFE CIRCLE ADULT D…Santa Fe Prep School: $10,000 · OtherSanta Fe Prep Schoo…NM Highland University Foundation: $5,000 · OtherNM Highland Univers…CASA HOGAR VILLA ALFONSO CAMARENA - GIRL SCHOOL & ORPHANAGE: $4,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $3,000 · OtherHaven of Hope: $3,000 · Other+5 more: $6,500 · Other+5 moreMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $31,003 · Arts & CultureMOVING AR…THE SANTA FE OPERA: $7,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA…United by Friendship Inc: $20,000 · InternationalLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $4,500 · PhilanthropySANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · EnvironmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $2,500 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$307,500Other$79,142Arts & Culture$38,003International$20,000Philanthropy$4,500Environment$4,500Youth Development$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $306,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $31,003 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetUnited by Friendship Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN NEW MEXICO SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds United by Friendship Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS PROGRAM NEW MEXICO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nancy Ann Mellen FoundationMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Luz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Luz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Luz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to La Luz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on La Luz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph