Skip to content

· Private foundation

La Amundson Ohana Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$764k
Granted FY2024still arriving
67
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$2.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$288kRecreation & Sports$241kHealth$195kCommunity Improvement$156kArts & Culture$76kPublic Benefit$65kHuman Services$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $207k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $256k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $301k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANBY HIGH SCHOOL$175,000
Individual grant recipient$64,356
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV$61,500
G&L BUILDERS INC$42,241
LATI$27,500
SLEEPY EYE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$25,000
NDSU$24,500
SMSU$23,500
MN STATE UNIVERSITY-MOORHEAD$17,000
SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL COLLEGE$15,500
UND$13,500
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA$13,000
NORTHLAND COMM & TECH COLLEGE$12,500
Individual grant recipient$11,072
ALEXANDRIA TECH & COMM COLL$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $5k → 12%THE DLCCC INC: $10k → 10%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%BEULAH PARK DISTRICT: $30k → 7%BEULAH PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
SD
IA
OH
NE
MO
KY
AZ
KS
HI
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 107 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

107 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
99

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+17%

Still filing today

29%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $339k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $101k · revenue +28%
  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $51k · revenue +42%
  • BP
    BEULAH PARK DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2023 · $40k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SV
    STORDEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2020 · $102k
  • SE
    SLEEPY EYE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -31% · 45% of their budget
  • RR
    RED ROCK CENTRAL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
Briar Cliff University

Briar cliff university is a community committed to higher education within a liberal arts and catholic perspective. in the franciscan tradition of service, caring and openness to all, briar cliff emphasizes quality education for its…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
11
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
12
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethany Lutheran College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henning Military Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/48
Grantees still filing
34/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $432,606 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANBY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $206,680 · OtherCANBY HIGH SCHOOL: $175,000 · Other+162 more: $3,183,961 · Other+162 moreAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $100,500 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $51,250 · EducationGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $22,500 · EducationUniversity of Mary: $19,500 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $15,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $15,250 · EducationBETHANY LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $14,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $12,000 · Education+19 more: $94,629 · EducationSLEEPY EYE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthBEULAH PARK DISTRICT: $40,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $10,200 · Human ServicesDLCCC INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSLEEPY EYE SPORTSMEN'S CLUB INC: $29,000 · Community ImprovementWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyONAWA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyLake Benton Opera House Inc: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,998,247Education$345,379Health$100,000Human Services$60,200Community Improvement$29,000Philanthropy$26,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $100,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEPY EYE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $51,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEULAH PARK DISTRICT: $40,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSLEEPY EYE SPORTSMEN'S CLUB INC: $29,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEPY EYE ARENA ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $15,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $15,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLE TREE DENTAL: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $10,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVIA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLake Benton Opera House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDLCCC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $6,129 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONAWA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYORK UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN COLLEGE: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SLEEPY EYE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BEULAH PARK DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds THE DANBURY FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK23.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · The Leonard Rydell Foundation · The Eagle Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Xcel Energy Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Paul & Mary Collins Trust · Edward L Schwab Memorial Foundation Dacotah Bank · Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · Louis J Elbert Trust · Joseph J Sinek Scholarship Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Amundson Ohana Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Amundson Ohana Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 230 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on La Amundson Ohana’s filings →

More from the funding graph