Skip to content

· Public charity

L2 Foundation

Exclusively to support the jewish community foundation of southern arizona (jcf), a 501(c)(3) organization, by receiving, administering and disbursing funds for the charitable purposes of jcf.

$200k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of L2 Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Jewish Community Foundation Of Southern Arizona, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year L2 Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $200k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
7
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Philanthropy$208kFood & Nutrition$75kHuman Services$70kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$25kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SA$75,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$30,000
EL RIO HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
EMERGE CENTER$20,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
OUR FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGE CENTER: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
2
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Goodwill Industries of Southern Az Inc

Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…

—
5
Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

Health
6
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
7
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
8
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

—
9
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Bridging the gap for arizona communities with nourishment for today and hope for tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
11
Chicanos Por La Causa Inc Cplc

We drive economic and political empowerment.

Human Services
12
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Community Services; the most unlike its peers is Southern Arizona Symphony Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $207,936 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONAEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FOUNDATION INCCommunity Food Bank Inc: $75,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank …YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEI…TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTER…Interfaith Community Services: $20,000 · OtherInterfaith …Our Family Services Inc: $15,000 · OtherOur Family …SOUTHERN ARIZONA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $7,500 · OtherSOUTHERN AR…The Primavera Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$232,936Food & Nutrition$75,000Human Services$50,000Other$42,500Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $207,936 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOur Family Services Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Southern ArizonaAZ17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · David S & Norma R Lewis Foundation · Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L2 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L2 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L2 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to L2 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph