Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

L2 Foundation

Exclusively to support the jewish community foundation of southern arizona (jcf), a 501(c)(3) organization, by receiving, administering and disbursing funds for the charitable purposes of jcf.

$200k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of L2 Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Jewish Community Foundation Of Southern Arizona, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year L2 Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $200k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
18
7
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182021.

Philanthropy$208kFood & Nutrition$75kHuman Services$70kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$25kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SA$75,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$30,000
EL RIO HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
EMERGE CENTER$20,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION$15,000
OUR FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGE CENTER: $20k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
2
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Goodwill Industries of Southern Az Inc

Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…

5
Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

Health
6
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
7
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
8
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

9
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Bridging the gap for arizona communities with nourishment for today and hope for tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
11
Chicanos Por La Causa Inc Cplc

We drive economic and political empowerment.

Human Services
12
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Southern Arizona Symphony Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $207,936 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONAEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FOUNDATION INCCommunity Food Bank Inc — $75,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank …YOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEI…TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $20,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTER…Interfaith Community Services — $20,000 · OtherInterfaith …Our Family Services Inc — $15,000 · OtherOur Family …SOUTHERN ARIZONA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $7,500 · OtherSOUTHERN AR…The Primavera Foundation Inc — $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$232,936Food & Nutrition$75,000Human Services$50,000Other$42,500Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $207,936 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInterfaith Community Services — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOur Family Services Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Southern ArizonaAZ17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · David S & Norma R Lewis Foundation · Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization L2 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L2 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to L2 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph