· Public charity
The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k17 grants · $214k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $585k
- $250k+1 grant · $428k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dress for Success Phoenix | $428,005 |
| Matriarch Ways | $65,200 |
| Poder | $65,000 |
| RE Frame Youth Arts Center | $65,000 |
| CAIR Arizona | $65,000 |
| Building Out Safer Spaces | $65,000 |
| BIPOC Loan Fund | $65,000 |
| Phoenix Legal Action Network | $65,000 |
| Dunbar Coalition | $65,000 |
| Scholarships AZ | $65,000 |
| Postpartum Support International | $30,000 |
| State Democracy Project | $30,000 |
| Community Investment Corporation | $12,000 |
| Instituto Lab | $12,000 |
| Beyond Resilient | $10,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $593k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UFUTAH FILM CENTER4× · 2018–2023 · $518k · revenue +128%
- TCTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE6× · 2017–2024 · $335k · revenue +112%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $327k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAone grant, 2020 · $110k
- SOState of Arizonaone grant, 2021 · $105k
- TJTUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $71k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…
CelebracinArtstica de lasAmricas(CALA)Alliancecollaborates with artists and arts organizations to nurture artistic talent, focusing onartistsfrom the Latin American diaspora.Through innovative artist residencies, commissions, community…
To create, foster, and resource new models for safety and justice outside the punishment system. We work with people impacted by the punishment system to promote a holistic view of safety that encompasses physical, emotional, and economic…
CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
Alianzas strives for equity and the dignity of diverse communities regardless of their country of origin by providing services to the under resourced and by promoting intercultural exchanges to connect all individuals in the broader…
We prioritize the needs of Black people through two programs: Disability Justice and Reproductive Justice. We believe that supporting mental healthcare, holding and creating space for vulnerability is a piece of how we free ourselves as…
The State of Black Arizona leads the production, synthesis, and socialization of actionable data and insights for all Arizonans, focusing on the Black community. We ensure that the factors leading to inequitable outcomes are identified,…
Arizona Statewide Independent Living Council, AZSILC is one of 56 Statewide Independent Living Councils, SILCs which are federally mandated under the Rehabilitation Act. There is one SILC in each state and US territory. AZSILC members are…
One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans
A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Southern Arizona and the most unlike its peers is Gloria's Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INVESTMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX LEGAL ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Cihuapactli Collective ↗
- Who funds BEYOND THE HURT ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds AFTERIMAGE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACK LIVES MATTER PHOENIX METRO ↗
- Who funds COMPASS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Poder in Action ↗
- Who funds Our Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds Splinter Art and Community Fund ↗
- Who funds I Am You 360 ↗
- Who funds TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
- Who funds Matriarch Ways Inc ↗
- Who funds REFRAME YOUTH ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
- Who funds DUNBAR COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIPSA Z ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE 19TH NEWS ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS USA ↗
- Who funds THE HAVEN ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUYENDO CIRCULES DE PAZ- CONSTRUCTING CIRCLES OF PEACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Social Venture Partners Tucson · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Community Food Bank Inc · Marshall Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The David and Lura Lovell · Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation · Absolon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.