Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation

The ZUCKERMAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION (foundation) supports local and national charitable organizations that promote both health and wellness as well as creative and artistic endeavors.

$6.9M
Granted FY2019
16
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of ZUCKERMAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $139k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.7M
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZUCKERMAN COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUN$3,340,624
Z FUND AT COMMUNITY FOUND FOR S AZ$3,340,624
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES$15,000
TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERV$15,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC$15,000
DIAPER BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$15,000
EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC AB$15,000
PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION INC$15,000
JR EL TOUR INC$15,000
TUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC$14,000
EL RIO HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
WRIGHT FLIGHT INC$10,000
INTEGRATIVE TOUCH FOR KIDS$7,500
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,500
BLAIR CHARITY GROUP$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMICIDE SURVIVORS INC: $8k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $10k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC AB: $15k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC AB: $15k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC AB: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$564k · 19 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$564k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+71%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Primavera Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $44k · revenue +54%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +172%
  • AD
    Arizona Diaper Bank
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • TG
    Tucson Girls Chorus Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +133%
  • LC
    LITERACY CONNECTSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +71%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS FOR SINGLE MOMS USA
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Corazon Az

CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…

Civil Rights
4
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

5
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
6
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
7
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
8
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
9
Tucson Investigative Reporting Center Inc

The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.

Animals
10
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
11
Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health
12
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tucson Centers for Women & Children Inc Dba Emerge Center Against Domestic Abuse and the most unlike its peers is Wright Flight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ZUCKERMAN COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUN — $3,340,624 · OtherZUCKERMAN COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT FUNZ FUND AT COMMUNITY FOUND FOR S AZ — $3,340,624 · OtherZ FUND AT COMMUNITY FOUND FOR S AZ+7 more — $153,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $40,000 · Human ServicesINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesHomicide Survivors Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $45,000 · HealthIntegrative Touch — $22,000 · HealthAMISTAD Y SALUD — $20,000 · HealthBag It — $19,000 · HealthJR EL TOUR INC — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsEL GRUPO YOUTH CYCLING — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Primavera Foundation Inc — $44,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Home Repair Projects of Arizona — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Food Bank Inc — $45,000 · Food & NutritionTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON — $22,000 · Arts & CultureDancing in the Streets Arizona — $12,000 · Arts & CultureTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,834,748Human Services$109,000Health$106,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Housing & Shelter$64,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Arts & Culture$44,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJR EL TOUR INC — $45,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $45,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc — $44,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank — $40,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWRIGHT FLIGHT INC — $35,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetEL GRUPO YOUTH CYCLING — $30,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetIntegrative Touch — $22,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON — $22,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Home Repair Projects of Arizona — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMISTAD Y SALUD — $20,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetBag It — $19,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDancing in the Streets Arizona — $12,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetTucson Girls Chorus Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ42.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Angel Charity for Children Inc · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Zuckerman Family Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Absolon Foundation · Tucson Medical Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Zuckerman Community Outreach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph