Skip to content

· Private foundation

L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3M
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIV MANSFIELD FBO CRAIG$19,747
BALDWIN WALLACE UNIV FBO JILLIAN$19,747
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIV FBO MAKENZIE$9,000
KENT STATE UNIV FBO SADIE MOSQUEDA$9,000
APEX ACADEMY FBO ELLA PAYNE$9,000
UNIV OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO FBO CECIL$9,000
ASHLAND UNIV FBO MADELYN SCHIEBER$7,181
OHIO STATE UNIV FBO CARSON WALKER$7,181
CAPITAL UNIV FBO ZACHARY ORIS$7,181
TIFFIN UNIV FBO ZAYNAH TATE$6,417
UNIV OF CINCINNATI FBO KAYA CAPRETTA$5,500
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER FBO AMANDA HARVEY$4,500
OHIO STATE UNIV FBO ADAM GEIGER$4,500
KENT STATE UNIV FBO CADEN JUTZ$4,500
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIV FBO MADISON$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $8k → 13%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT: $6k → 12%BALL STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY: $13k → 9%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 9%THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $10k → 10%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MIAMI UNIVERSITY OF OHIO: $11k → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION: $7k → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL STATE COLLEGE: $20k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $6k → 16%29 QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS: $124k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY: $6k → 9%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 9%THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $6k → 10%MIAMI UNIVERSITY OF OHIO: $6k → 12%MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%MALONE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 13%OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AT: $18k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $4k → 16%OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 15%OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$664k · 43 repeat orgs$593k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
54

Total granted

$664k
$441k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

14%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    Mount Vernon Nazarene University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $24k · revenue +21%
  • OU
    Otterbein University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $21k · revenue +2%
  • TU
    The University of Findlay
    2× · 2018–2019 · $19k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • 2Q
    29 QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS
    one grant, 2017 · $124k
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AT
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
2
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
3
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
4
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
5
Mercyhurst University

Rooted in our Mercy Catholic liberal arts identity, we educate and inspire diverse learners in an environment where faith and reason flourish together for meaningful lives, dignified work, and leadership in service toward a just and loving…

Education
6
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
7
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
8
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
9
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
12
Manchester University Inc

Manchester University respects the infinite worth of every individual and graduates persons of ability and conviction who draw upon their education and faith to lead principled, productive, and compassionate lives that improve the human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Northern University; the most unlike its peers is North Central State College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

29 QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS: $123,825 · Other29 QUALIFIED SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS+109 more: $1,006,389 · Other+109 moreMount Vernon Nazarene University: $24,000 · EducationMount Verno…Otterbein University: $20,578 · EducationOtterbein U…The University of Findlay: $18,798 · EducationThe Univers…THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $16,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE…Cedarville University: $12,000 · EducationCedarville …Ohio Northern University: $10,196 · EducationOhio Northe…Spring Arbor University: $8,000 · EducationSpring Arbo…University of Mount Union: $6,798 · EducationUniversity …MALONE UNIVERSITY: $6,798 · EducationMALONE UNIV…+1 more: $3,500 · Education
Other$1,130,214Education$126,668

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $20,578 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $18,798 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $10,196 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $6,798 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $6,798 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,917 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mount Vernon Nazarene University ↗
  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ohio Foundation OfOH13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ohio Foundation Of · Council of Independent Colleges · Ibm International Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr?

    Find your warmest path to L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on L J & N a Davis Fdtn Schlr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph