Skip to content

· Private foundation

L Dexter Woodman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$172kCommunity Improvement$37kHuman Services$9kEmployment$8kReligion$6kHealth$2kYouth Development$500Arts & Culture$258Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PINGREE SCHOOL$2,500
BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS$2,489
MASSACHUSETTS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIO$2,000
IPSWICH CARING$1,000
ACTION INC$500
WENHAM MUSEUM$258
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$105
GENEROUS GARDENERS$103
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ACTION INC: $500 → 10%ACTION INC: $500 → 10%ACTION INC: $500 → 10%IPSWICH CARING: $1k → 10%CONNOR'S KINDNESS PROJECT: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of L Dexter Woodman Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 78%.

L Dexter Woodman Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 22 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
45

Total granted

$166k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+26%

Still filing today

23%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +50%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +59%
  • BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—
2
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
3
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
4
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
5
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
6
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Trinity Health of New England Corporation Inc

We, trinity health of new england and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health of new england is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
International Institute of New England Inc

For more than a century, the international institute of new england (iine) has been creating opportunities for refugees and immigrants to succeed through resettlement, education, career advancement, and pathways to citizenship. founded in…

Civil Rights
12
Managers of Boston Port and Seamen's Aid Society
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beverly Bootstraps Community Services I; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · OtherMASS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH SHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $10,499 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherNORTHSHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8,997 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,300 · Other+62 more: $132,277 · Other+62 moreTHE PINGREE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE PINGR…+1 more: $105 · EducationBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $7,489 · Community ImprovementACTION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesIPSWICH CARING INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCONNOR'S KINDNESS PROJECT INC: $250 · Human ServicesROOT NS INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 · HealthGENEROUS GARDENERS INC: $103 · Environment
Other$210,073Education$20,105Community Improvement$7,489Human Services$2,750Food & Nutrition$2,500Health$500Environment$103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PINGREE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $10,499 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $7,489 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROOT NS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIPSWICH CARING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNOR'S KINDNESS PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENEROUS GARDENERS INC: $103 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds ROOT NS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · McCarthy Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L Dexter Woodman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L Dexter Woodman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Root Ns Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Action Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on L Dexter Woodman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph