Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

L&R Parker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$380kInternational$102kYouth Development$100kHealth$72kArts & Culture$42kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$25kEducation$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND BUSINESS$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMMANITY$7,500
TISD FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MISCELLANEOUS - K-1 PASSTHROUGH$63
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE MAGDALENE HOME: $20k → 12%LIVING ALTERNATIVES: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$641k · 7 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$641k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
-30%

Still filing today

57%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +92%
  • SO
    Serving Orphans Worldwide Inc
    2× · 2018–2024 · $77k · revenue +74%
  • BH
    BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $72k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF GOD WORLD MISSIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • EM
    Ekisa Ministries International Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF HUGHES SPRINGS
    one grant, 2021 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missions Development International

MDI provides ministry leaders with high-caliber mentoring and innovative content to unleash their God-given potential.

International
2
Sower of Seeds International Ministries

SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.

Religion
3
Alternatives

Alternatives provides medical and educational services that empower men and women to make life affirming choices concerning pregnancy and sexual health.

Religion
4
Streams of Light International Inc

Streams of Light International brings hope and healing to the world through comprehensive evangelismtraining and mobilizing lay members to reach every home, especially in the large cities, with the everlasting gospel as revealed in the…

Religion
5
Christaid International Inc

Putting God's love in action by providing relief, Christian care and education to families in Uganda. We strive to accomplish this by providing education opportunities to children aged 3-18, and providing basic needs and healthcare to…

Human Services
6
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
7
Theresians International Inc

Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.

8
Training Leaders International

Training Leaders International mentors and sends evangelical scholars and pastors to teach in locations where theological education is difficult to access.

Religion
9
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

10
Network Beyond

Network Beyond is a Christian organization serving vulnerable and under-resourced people. We focus on three areas: 1. Leadership development - equipping global leaders with biblically based training. 2. Compassion and justice - support for…

Crime & Legal
11
Ekissa

Ekissa's ministry is to create long term stainability in Uganda by establising a church and orphanage within the country

12
Global Effect Ministries

Global Effect Ministries teaches principles to build healthy families and strong marriages in developing nations. We care for orphans, widows, and people in need by developing nationals, empower impoverished individuals to find ways to…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Sky Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tyler Ind School District Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROSE HEIGHTS CHURCH — $310,000 · OtherROSE HEIGHTS CHURCHCHURCH OF GOD WORLD MISSIONS — $50,000 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD WORLD MISSIONSACHIEVING DREAMS OF TYLER — $31,575 · OtherACHIEVING DREAMS OF TYLEREAST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $27,500 · OtherEAST TEXAS FOOD BANKFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF HUGHES SPRINGS — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $17,000 · Other+6 more — $32,563 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF SKY RA…Ekisa Ministries International Inc — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentEkisa Ministries …Serving Orphans Worldwide Inc — $77,000 · Food & NutritionServing Or…BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $72,000 · HealthBETHESDA …TYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $23,000 · EducationMagdalene Ministries International Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesBEYOND BUSINESS — $10,000 · Religion
Other$489,638Youth Development$125,000Food & Nutrition$77,000Health$72,000Education$23,000Human Services$22,500Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetServing Orphans Worldwide Inc — $77,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $72,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEkisa Ministries International Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMagdalene Ministries International Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC
  • Who funds Serving Orphans Worldwide Inc
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC
  • Who funds Ekisa Ministries International Inc
  • Who funds TYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Magdalene Ministries International Inc
  • Who funds BEYOND BUSINESS
  • Who funds LIVING ALTERNATIVES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization L&R Parker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph