Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kessler Family Foundation

Supports charitable, educational, & religious purposes of jewish comm federation of sf.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$355kHealth$143kInternational$120kCommunity Improvement$90kEducation$35kOther$345k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $159,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $215,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$50,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$40,000
CHABAD OF ALAMEDA$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER$17,500
CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND$17,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REUTLINGER COMMUNITY FOR JEWISH LIVING: $20k → 9%THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 10%TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $18k → 17%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $4k → 6%THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 10%TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $4k → 6%CHABAD OF ALAMEDA: $25k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $50k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND: $36k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $43k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM HEALTH CARE CAMPUS: $8k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND: $17k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $42k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND: $17k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $40k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM HEALTH CARE CAMPUS: $8k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND: $12k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $40k → 10%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%OAKLAND PROMISE: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $40k → 10%OAKLAND PROMISE: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $40k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER FOUNDATION: $120k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION AND ENDOWMENT FUND OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%OAKLAND PROMISE: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $15k → 10%EAST BAY COLLEGE FUND DBA OAKLAND PROMISE: $6k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $10k → 10%TEMPLE BETH ABRAHAM: $5k → 10%OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 10%TEMPLE BETH ABRAHAM: $5k → 10%OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND AKA OAKLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND: $5k → 10%OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND AKA OAKLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $8k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE EAST BAY: $110k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $8k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE EAST BAY: $88k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Kessler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kessler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$564k · 9 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$564k
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+33%

Still filing today

78%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +78%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +99%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN
    one grant, 2017 · $120k · revenue -9%
  • TR
    THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
12
Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $344,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN F…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE GREATER EAST BAY — $197,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE …CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAND 327 MACARTHUR BLVD — $97,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF OAKLAN…CHABAD OF ALAMEDA — $25,000 · OtherCHABAD OF ALAMEDATHE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY — $20,000 · OtherTHE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY+1 more — $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $120,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOS…JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $15,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $8,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $80,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRI…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $40,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT I…COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $90,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…OAKLAND PROMISE — $24,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $11,000 · Education
Philanthropy$354,500Other$345,000Health$143,000International$120,000Community Improvement$90,000Education$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $344,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE GREATER EAST BAY — $197,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $120,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $80,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE — $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY — $6,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Jewish Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kessler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kessler Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kessler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph