Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kueber Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$230kHuman Services$149kEducation$146kInternational$93kFood & Nutrition$81kCrime & Legal$63kArts & Culture$50kCommunity Improvement$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $182k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKYS HEARTLAND INC$30,000
FIRST CAR PROJECT INC$30,000
USPIRITUS$25,000
VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOLERS SERVICES$25,000
KLEB INC$17,000
US FUND FOR UNICEF$15,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC$15,000
DARE TO CARE INC$15,000
HOSPARUS INC$10,000
FHGR INC$5,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN PLACE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FIRST CAR PROJECT INC: $30k → 4%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $9k → 15%BLESSING IN A BACKPACK INC: $6k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $48k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $10k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN PLACE INC: $24k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 14 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$752k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+134%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $88k · revenue +23%
  • KI
    KLEB INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $67k · revenue +1%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BI
    BROOKLAWN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +134%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
2
Kids in Distress Inc

The mission of the corporation is to prevent child abuse, preserve the family, and treat children who have been abused and neglected.

Human Services
3
Family Central Inc

To provide services to improve the quality of life for children and families.

Human Services
4
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
5
Kids Above All Illinois

Helping chicagoland's at-risk children and their families build, achieve and sustain better lives.

—
6
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
7
Kids First Law Center

Kids first gives children a voice in divorce, custody, and other conflicts by providing focused legal representation and services for kids.

Crime & Legal
8
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
9
The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo

The legal aid bureau of buffalo, inc., a not-for-profit organization, provides legal representation to financially needy men, women and children in western new york. through its skilled staff, the legal aid bureau seeks equal justice for…

Crime & Legal
10
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
11
HealthFirst Bluegrass Inc

Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.

Health
12
Children's Alliance Incorporated

Shape public policy and practice to improve the well-being of kentucky's at-risk children and families through advocacy, leadership, collaboration, and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family & Children's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is First Car Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOLERS SERVICES: $108,750 · OtherVISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOLERS SERVIC…LEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $62,500 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY INCBROOKLAWN INC: $50,000 · OtherBROOKLAWN INCAMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $31,250 · OtherAMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INCKY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND CHAR FDTN: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $19,792 · Other+3 moreFAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $87,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE…HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $57,500 · Human ServicesHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEA…FIRST CAR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesFIRST CAR PROJECT INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $15,625 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK I…USPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN): $100,000 · HealthUSPIRITUS INC (BELLEWO…KLEB INC: $67,000 · HealthKLEB INC+1 more: $5,000 · HealthDARE TO CARE INC: $50,000 · InternationalDARE TO CARE…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $42,917 · InternationalUNITED STATE…FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $65,000 · Food & NutritionONEWEST CORPORATION: $31,250 · Community ImprovementTeach for America Inc: $22,917 · Education
Other$282,292Human Services$190,625Health$172,000International$92,917Food & Nutrition$65,000Community Improvement$31,250Education$22,917

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN): $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $87,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKLEB INC: $67,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY INC: $62,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $57,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $42,917 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $31,250 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetONEWEST CORPORATION: $31,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST CAR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $22,917 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $15,625 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $4,167 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kueber Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kueber Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kueber Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph