Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Krumbein Charities Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$86kReligion$18kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$7kHuman Services$4kEducation$2kInternational$2kCivil Rights$725Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$200
Median grant
4
States reached
$440k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND$21,100
TEMPLE BETH-EL$6,704
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION$5,000
RICHMOND CHRISTMAS MOTHER FUND$253
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$250
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$229
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$200
HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE$200
VPM MEDIA CORPORATION$125
CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND$106
THE POSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION$100
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$100
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$50
AMERICAN GUILD OF ORGANISTS$20
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $20 → 22%UMFS: $100 → 9%UMFS: $50 → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $695 → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 22%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $229 → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $200 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
VA
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 19 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
25

Total granted

$111k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+23%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND
    5× · 2019–2024 · $86k · revenue +28%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND
    2× · 2019–2024 · $924 · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +28%
  • MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $600 · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
2
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
7
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…

Health
11
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Cj's Thumbs Up Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Classical Music EnsemblesChild and Family ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Independent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsJewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr15%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr15%2%35–55yr15%91%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND — $85,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND+1 more — $106 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient — $25,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH-EL — $16,854 · OtherTEMPLE BETH-EL+26 more — $5,971 · Other+26 moreMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationRichmond Hebrew Day School — $600 · EducationRIVERSIDE SCHOOL INC — $550 · Education+2 more — $300 · EducationCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,800 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $250 · HealthPOSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION — $200 · HealthCJ's Thumbs Up Foundation — $150 · Health+1 more — $25 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND — $924 · Human ServicesJewish Family Services Inc — $700 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Family Services of Virginia — $150 · Human Services+1 more — $20 · Human ServicesMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $600 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $565 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $270 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $208 · International+3 more — $150 · InternationalFEED MORE INC — $600 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $100 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$85,906Other$48,105Education$6,450Health$2,425Human Services$1,794International$1,793Food & Nutrition$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND — $85,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART CENTER INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND — $924 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRichmond Hebrew Day School — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $565 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE SCHOOL INC — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC — $498 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $208 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCJ's Thumbs Up Foundation — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Methodist Family Services of Virginia — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVPM MEDIA CORPORATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStand Together Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN GUILD OF ORGANISTS — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Herndon Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Nachman-Marks Foundation Trust Attn J Nachman · Kathryn & W H Schwarzschild Fund · George J & Effie L Seay · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Krumbein Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Krumbein Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Krumbein Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph