Skip to content

· Private foundation

Krause Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$559kHealth$43kHuman Services$23kEmployment$15kCommunity Improvement$12kFood & Nutrition$8kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$130,000
INCIGHT$10,000
KIDS TLC$10,000
WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY$8,500
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
CENTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
NAPLES HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY$2,000
ST LUKES FOUNDATION$2,000
OHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILSONVILLE COMMUNITY SHARING: $1k → 8%REDEMPTORIST SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
OH
NE
MO
KS
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 22 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
47

Total granted

$534k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+16%

Still filing today

41%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2017–2025 · $152k · revenue +46%
  • KI
    KIDSTLC INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • VO
    VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8graduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • SE
    SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • KU
    KSTATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
3
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
4
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University; the most unlike its peers is Wilsonville Community Sharing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESSMER INC: $131,000 · OtherMESSMER INCBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $33,000 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherKIDSTLC INC: $20,000 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF ECONOMICS INC: $16,000 · Other+46 more: $182,874 · Other+46 moreMarquette University: $151,500 · EducationMarquette UniversityAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · EducationAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INCOHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationINCIGHT COMPANY: $10,000 · EducationAVILA UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · Education+8 more: $28,000 · Education+8 moreVARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyJourney 21 Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthSaint Lukes Foundation: $2,000 · HealthCaringBridge: $1,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 · HealthWOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $5,000 · EmploymentREDEMPTORIST SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesWILSONVILLE COMMUNITY SHARING: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$438,874Education$223,500Philanthropy$17,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$9,000Employment$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $151,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSTLC INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL OF ECONOMICS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJourney 21 Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CENTER EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDEMPTORIST SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILSONVILLE COMMUNITY SHARING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Journey 21 Inc ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8 ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INCIGHT COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOOSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CENTER EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The H & R Block Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Edward & Kathryn Mader Foundation · E Kemper Carter & Anna Curry Carter Community · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · Health Forward Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Greater Horizons · Tulsa Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krause Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krause Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Ave Maria University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Krause Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Krause Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krause Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph