Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kraft Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$2.2MYouth Development$315kEducation$215kCivil Rights$60kCommunity Improvement$60kPhilanthropy$38kPublic Benefit$17kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $580k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$300,000
PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$200,000
PHOENIX SEMINARY$150,000
CORAL RIDGE MINISTRIES MEDIA INC$100,000
MENTORKIDS USA$80,000
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$50,000
ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL$40,000
PAWPRINT MINISTRIES$35,000
NEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS DBA 1517$20,000
CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTERS$20,000
STAND TO REASON$20,000
LUTEC - CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY - NEBRASKA$10,000
ARIZONA FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
LUTHERAN URBAN MISSION AGENCY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRIST LUTHERAN BEST PRACTICES CONF: $30k → 11%STREET LIFE: $33k → 7%NEW REFORMATION PUBLICATIONS DBA 1517: $20k → 11%STAND TO REASON: $20k → 14%CORAL RIDGE MINISTRIES MEDIA INC: $100k → 13%LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES: $50k → 11%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION: $300k → 12%PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $200k → 7%PAWPRINT MINISTRIES: $35k → 15%IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20k → 23%CHRIST LUTHERAN BEST PRACTICES CONF: $30k → 11%STAND TO REASON: $20k → 14%TIMOTHY LUTHERAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $40k → 15%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION: $250k → 12%PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $150k → 7%PAWPRINT MINISTRIES: $35k → 15%CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30k → 11%STAND TO REASON: $20k → 14%TIMOTHY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 15%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION: $250k → 12%PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $150k → 7%PAWPRINT MINISTRIES: $35k → 15%STAND TO REASON: $20k → 14%TIMOTHY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20k → 15%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION: $250k → 12%PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $100k → 7%ST TERESA HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 15%MENTORKIDS USA: $80k → 11%STAND TO REASON: $20k → 14%MULTIPLI: $75k → 7%MENTORKIDS USA: $65k → 11%MULTIPLI: $50k → 7%PAWPRINT MINISTRIES: $25k → 15%ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL: $40k → 11%MULTIPLI: $30k → 7%MENTORKIDS USA: $65k → 11%ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL: $35k → 11%MENTORKIDS USA: $50k → 11%ARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL: $25k → 11%MENTORKIDS USA: $50k → 11%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $150k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $100k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $100k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $100k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $50k → 11%MENTORKIDS USA: $50k → 11%PHOENIX SEMINARY: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Kraft Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kraft Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 21 repeat orgs$403k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$3.6M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+45%

Still filing today

29%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $600k · revenue +104%
  • MU
    MentorKids USA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $360k · revenue +54%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHRIST LUTHERAN BEST PRACTICES CONF
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • TL
    TIMOTHY LUTHERAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
6
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
7
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
Presbyterian Reformed Ministries International

Exalting jesus christ igniting the church in the power of the holy spirit under the authority of the holy bible as the word of god through prayer, leadership development, growing the church, and mission outreach so that the church may be…

Religion
10
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
11
Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International
12
The River Network International

To strengthen church planters through discernment, training, coaching and continuing education.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pastoral Leadership Institute; the most unlike its peers is MentorKids Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,050,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPAWPRINT MINISTRIES: $165,000 · OtherPAWPRINT MINISTRIESARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCEL: $110,000 · OtherARIZONA URBAN YOUTH EXCELST TERESA HIGH SCHOOL: $70,000 · Other+24 more: $615,594 · Other+24 morePASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $600,000 · ReligionPASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTEMentorKids USA: $360,000 · ReligionMentorKids USAMULTIPLI: $155,000 · ReligionMULTIPLISTAND TO REASON: $120,000 · ReligionSTAND TO REASONCoral Ridge Ministries Media Inc: $100,000 · ReligionCoral Ridge Ministries Media Inc+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $550,000 · EducationPHOENIX SEMINARY…Grand Canyon University: $50,000 · EducationGrand Canyon Uni…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 · Civil RightsCenter for Renewing America Inc: $17,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,010,594Religion$1,340,000Education$600,000Civil Rights$60,000Public Benefit$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $600,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $550,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMentorKids USA: $360,000 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetMULTIPLI: $155,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSTAND TO REASON: $120,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Renewing America Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds MentorKids USA ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLI ↗
  • Who funds STAND TO REASON ↗
  • Who funds Coral Ridge Ministries Media Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds Center for Renewing America Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kraft Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kraft Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kraft Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kraft Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kraft’s filings →

    More from the funding graph