How much did KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY grant in FY2024?

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY reported 130 grants totaling $6,833,762 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY based?

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY is based in IN.

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Community foundation

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY

(continued from form 990, part I, line 1) we granted nearly 7 million in arts/culture, civic, human services, recreation, health, education, environment, and faith based and religion projects.

$6.8M

Granted FY2024

130

Grants

Communities

$1.7M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

air packsbridgescienceresidentialdrug alcoholhungercharge

2020

capital genmissons gencovid genpop-upnvmdrug alcoholschps gen

2021

technology genparentsguatemalapatientsmuncieteenmilford

2022

suppportsupptrailsartshowsciencerescue

2023

dive teamteam equipmenthighestincreasebicyclingcreate displaydisplay maintain

2024

booksenvironmentsteenschoolingmuncieimpactbiblical

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 130 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k48 grants · $335k
$10k–50k62 grants · $1.3M
$50k–250k18 grants · $2.0M
$250k+2 grants · $2.0M

$11,131

Median grant

States reached

$96M

Total assets

Largest grants

KOSCIUSKO CHAMBER OF COMM FOUND$1,666,850
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$300,735
NORTH WEBSTER COMMUNITY CENTER INC$243,000
SEELYVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$225,551
JOE'S KIDS$158,447
BALL STATE UNIVERSITY$150,368
WARSAW AREA CAREER CENTER$150,000
HUMANITY AND HOPE UNITED FOUNDATION$142,118
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KOSICIUSKO$124,774
CITY CHURCH FOR ALL NATIONS$100,000
HOOSIERS FOR GOOD$100,000
HEART SOUL MIND & STRENGTH$100,000
OAKWOOD FOUNDATION INC$68,816
WARSAW COMMUNITY CHURCH$68,000
GRACE COLLEGE AND SEMINARY$63,186

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$19M · 149 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

149 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

149

Total granted

$19M

$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+26%

Still filing today

68%

51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $996k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KC
KOSCIUSKO CHAMBER OF COMM FOUND
3× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +402% · 91% of their budget
HUMANITY AND HOPE UNITED FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $840k · revenue +47%
FM
FELLOWSHIP MISSIONS
7× · 2018–2024 · $624k · revenue +301%

Funded once

KD
KOSCIUSKO DEVELOLPMENT LAND TRUST
one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue -60% · 100% of their budget
MA
MICHIANA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT
one grant, 2021 · $200k
CI
CENTRAL INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO
one grant, 2019 · $122k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Indiana United Methodist Children's

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services

Our Hospice of South

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 43 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services

Waycross Inc

Provides conference center and camping facilities for religious, educational and charitable groups in central and southern indiana.

Recreation & Sports

Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—

Fort Wayne Rescue Mission

To provide, through the power of jesus christ, a home for the homeless, food for the hungry, and hope for their future.

Housing & Shelter

Laporte County Leadership Inc

Leadership training

—

Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles.

Health

Western Indiana Community Action

To provide greater use of new types of services & innovative approaches in attacking the causes of poverty, so as to develop increasingly effective methods of employing available resources & to provide maximum feasible participation of the…

Human Services

Community Center of Hope Inc

Identify, organize and facilitate programs and services for improving the quality of life of hope, indiana and the surrounding area.

Recreation & Sports

Crosswinds Inc

Crosswinds, inc. is a not-for-profit, faith-based organization created in 2012 with a mission of changing hearts and bringing hope to individuals, families and communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child and Parent Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Franklin College of Indiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%1/226

the rest of the field

10%

1,233/11,939

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

150 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

143/150

Grantees still filing

108/150

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$11,612,149Education$3,394,425Community Improvement$2,812,500Human Services$1,363,217Religion$1,316,077Health$1,288,473International$1,173,913

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kosciusko 21st Century Foundation IncIN60.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kosciusko 21st Century Foundation Inc · United Way of Kosciusko County Inc · Community Foundation of Greater · The Dr Dane & Mary Louise Miller · Parkview Health System Inc · Esther Pfleiderer Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Hand Family Foundation Inc · Zimmer Biomet Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Whitley County Community · Community Foundation · Terry L and Sandra K Tucker Family Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KOSCIUSKO DEVELOLPMENT LAND TRUST.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852875029 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on KOSCIUSKO DEVELOLPMENT LAND TRUST, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Kosciusko County Community?

Find your warmest path to Kosciusko County Community through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

150 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kosciusko County Community?

More from the funding graph

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

150 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kosciusko County Community?

More from the funding graph