Skip to content
Koretsky Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Koretsky Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$85kEducation$28kHuman Services$24kReligion$12kInternational$11kPhilanthropy$3kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION$10,000
AUSHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDAT$2,500
BE EQUAL FOUNDATION$2,500
LIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION$500
WESPARK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABILITY PLUS INC: $1k → 11%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION: $10k → 6%WESPARK: $500 → 14%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION: $10k → 6%WESPARK: $500 → 14%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
SC
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 11 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
29

Total granted

$112k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+7%

Still filing today

64%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    4× · 2018–2021 · $28k · revenue +87%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +385%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2018–2020 · $21k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TD
    TEMPLE DOR DORIM
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MC
    MAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +103%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
11
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for University Hospital a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF: $22,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OFTEMPLE DOR DORIM: $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE DOR DORIMIndividual grant recipient: $5,357 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPTS: $3,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY: $2,500 · OtherCENTER FOR PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICI: $2,500 · OtherWESPARKS CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $2,250 · Other+14 more: $10,550 · Other+14 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $21,100 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERMAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC: $10,000 · HealthMAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES I…FOUNDATION FOR UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR UNIVERSITY HO…DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE …+7 more: $5,050 · Health+7 moreUniversity of Miami: $27,500 · EducationUniversity of MiamiBe Equal: $2,500 · EducationBe Equal+1 more: $500 · EducationSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesSOCIETY FOR THE …ABILITY PLUS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesWESPARK INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $63 · Human ServicesTHE AUSCHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATION: $11,000 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $700 · Recreation & SportsLIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION: $500 · Youth DevelopmentPALM BEACH HABILITATION CENTER INC: $400 · Employment
Other$58,157Health$41,650Education$30,500Human Services$24,563International$11,000Recreation & Sports$700Youth Development$500Employment$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Miami: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $21,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AUSCHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMAAGALIM COMMUNITY CIRCLES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL STRIDES INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCFC Loud N Clear Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetABILITY PLUS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESPARK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE SAM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EILEEN STEIN JACOBY FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKESHER LD INC KESHER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH HABILITATION CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlaying For Life Foundation: $350 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $63 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Koretsky Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Koretsky Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Special Strides Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Koretsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home