Skip to content

· Public charity

Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York Inc

To support and assist members of the korean community to be healthy and productive individuals.

$217k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$476kHuman Services$296kCommunity Improvement$204kHousing & Shelter$116kPublic Benefit$80kReligion$9k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $79,147, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,237 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $138,090 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
$34,386
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITIES RESIST$37,984
THE KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER$34,386
KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC$6,777
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%KSC PUBLIC HEALTH & RESEARCH CENTER: $32k → 13%MEXICAN COALITION: $71k → 28%Chinese - American planning council: $58k → 17%CHINESE - AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $39k → 17%CHINESE - AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $34k → 17%THE YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS: $83k → 13%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $29k → 13%Minkwon center for community action inc: $25k → 13%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $19k → 13%THE YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS: $11k → 13%THE KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $66k → 13%THE KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $34k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+207%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $189k · revenue +131%
  • HP
    HEALTH PEOPLE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $187k · revenue +41%
  • CP
    CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $131k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • MC
    MEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $71k · revenue +207% · 26% of their budget
  • KC
    KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue +132%
  • KP
    KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF QUEENS
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean Culture Center of New York

The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…

Arts & Culture
2
Caaav Voice Inc

CAAAV Voice is a grassroot organization aiming to empower Asian immigrant communities by organizing against gentrification, tenant rights and promote social justice.

—
3
Co-Counsel Nyc Inc

To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Council of Peoples Organization Inc

Organizations most significant activity is to assist low income immigrant families, particularly south asians and muslims, to reach their full potential as residents of nyc.copo empowers marginalized communities to advocate for their…

Human Services
5
Women Empowerment Coalition of Nyc

Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.

Human Services
6
New York Chinese Cultural Center Inc

It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…

Arts & Culture
7
Korean Community Center of the East Bay

The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.

—
8
Korean Community Service Center of Greater Washington Inc

Korean Community Service Center of Greater of Washington (KCSCGW) is a non-profit, community-based agency supported by government agencies, foundations and concerned individuals. KCSCGW has been providing support and assistance to…

Human Services
9
Korean Community Development Services Center

Korean community development services centers (kcdsc) mission is to provide the members of our community with support services that they need to achieve personal growth and pursue community growth. kcdsc also provides services to…

—
10
Kalusugan Coalition Inc Co Mario Treglia Cpa

None

Education
11
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

Civil Rights
12
Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc

CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Voces Latinas Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $131,151 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INCThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc: $99,999 · Human ServicesThe Korean American Family Service Center IncTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS: $93,662 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEEN…MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $73,125 · Human ServicesMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INCMEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $71,320 · Human ServicesMEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH A…KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YO…FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC: $189,368 · HealthFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INCHEALTH PEOPLE INC: $186,635 · HealthHEALTH PEOPLE INCVOCES LATINAS CORPORATION: $100,000 · HealthVOCES LATINAS CORPORATIONCommunities Resist Inc: $115,984 · Housing & ShelterCommunities…KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC: $79,853 · Civil RightsKOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF QUEENS: $8,868 · Other
Human Services$500,757Health$476,003Housing & Shelter$115,984Civil Rights$79,853Other$8,868

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC: $189,368 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH PEOPLE INC: $186,635 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $131,151 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCommunities Resist Inc: $115,984 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetVOCES LATINAS CORPORATION: $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc: $99,999 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS: $93,662 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC: $79,853 over 3y, 14% of budgetMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $73,125 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetMEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $71,320 over 1y, 26% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $31,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Korean-American Community Foundation Inc · Asian American Federation Inc · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $133k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph