· Public charity
Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York Inc
To support and assist members of the korean community to be healthy and productive individuals.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $79,147 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $217,237 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $138,090 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITIES RESIST | $37,984 |
| THE KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER | $34,386 |
| KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC | $6,777 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC2× · 2019–2020 · $189k · revenue +126%
- HPHEALTH PEOPLE INC2× · 2019–2020 · $187k · revenue +41%
- CPCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC3× · 2017–2019 · $131k · revenue +162%
Funded once
- MCMEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $71k · revenue +207% · 26% of their budget
- KCKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue +132%
- KPKOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF QUEENSone grant, 2021 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…
To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.
The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.
It is dedicated to deepening the understanding and appreciation of chinese culture in the global and local communities. it fulfills its mission by offering professional classes, workshops, and performances while nurturing creative new…
African services committee's mission is to support the african community through provision of health, housing, social and legal services and advocacy to african diaspora refugees and immigrants in new york city and to provide reproductive…
Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.
Korean community development services centers (kcdsc) mission is to provide the members of our community with support services that they need to achieve personal growth and pursue community growth. kcdsc also provides services to…
None
CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…
Organizations most significant activity is to assist low income immigrant families, particularly south asians and muslims, to reach their full potential as residents of nyc.copo empowers marginalized communities to advocate for their…
Korean Community Service Center of Greater of Washington (KCSCGW) is a non-profit, community-based agency supported by government agencies, foundations and concerned individuals. KCSCGW has been providing support and assistance to…
We aspire to a world in which korean american leaders serve at the highest levels in society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Voces Latinas Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Communities Resist Inc ↗
- Who funds VOCES LATINAS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Korean American Family Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF QUEENS ↗
- Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MEXICAN COALITION FOR THE EMPOWERMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Korean-American Community Foundation Inc · Asian American Federation Inc · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Korean Community Services of Metropolitan New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.