Skip to content

· Public charity

Konza United Way Inc

Our mission is to create long-lasting changes by addressing underlying causes of community problems relating to health, education and income.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$453kCrime & Legal$436kHousing & Shelter$421kYouth Development$329kHealth$256kCommunity Improvement$228kReligion$29kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $177,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $200,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $137k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC$40,000
ATA BUS$25,000
CRISIS CENTER$24,000
SUNFLOWER CASA PROJECT INC$20,000
FLINT HILLS BREADBASKET$15,000
BOYSGIRLS CLUB$13,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH MINISTRY$9,000
KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES$8,500
PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH$8,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$8,000
BE ABLE INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOUSE CAFE: $12k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$2.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+37%

Still filing today

74%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +115%
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $257k · revenue +89%
  • FH
    Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOUSE CAFE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +37%
  • OG
    OAK GROVE SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -90%
  • FH
    FLINT HILLS VOLUNTEER CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Services of Kansas City Inc

The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Civil Rights
3
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
4
Community Action Inc

Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.

Human Services
5
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
7
Family Service and Guidance Center of Topeka Inc

Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…

Health
8
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
9
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
10
Frankfort Community Care Home Inc

The organization owns and operates a skilled nursing facility for the elderly and disabled in Frankfort, Kansas.

—
11
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
12
Habitat for Humanity of Nodaway County Inc

Provide affordable housing to low-income families

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pony Express Partnership for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISIS CENTER INC: $257,050 · OtherCRISIS CENTER INCFlint Hills Area Transportation Agency: $222,750 · OtherFlint Hills Area Transportation AgencyBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $161,950 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC: $136,700 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INCKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $130,650 · OtherKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INCSALVATION ARMY RILEY COUNTY: $38,642 · Other+12 more: $174,342 · Other+12 moreMANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $376,800 · Housing & ShelterMANHATTAN EMERGENCY…SUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $305,200 · Civil RightsSUNFLOWER CHILD…COMMUNITY CARE MINISTRIES INC: $190,700 · HealthCOMMUNITY …FLINT HILLS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $20,100 · HealthFLINT HILL…SHEPHERD'S CROSSING: $78,600 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $48,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE CAFE INC: $11,800 · Human ServicesBE ABLE INC: $28,500 · ReligionPONY EXPRESS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $18,125 · Youth Development
Other$1,122,084Housing & Shelter$376,800Civil Rights$305,200Health$210,800Human Services$138,900Religion$28,500Youth Development$18,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $376,800 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $305,200 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $257,050 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetFlint Hills Area Transportation Agency: $222,750 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE MINISTRIES INC: $190,700 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC: $136,700 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $130,650 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSHEPHERD'S CROSSING: $78,600 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $48,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHousing and Credit Counseling Inc: $35,900 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBE ABLE INC: $28,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFLINT HILLS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $20,100 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPONY EXPRESS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $18,125 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC: $12,242 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOUSE CAFE INC: $11,800 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOAK GROVE SCHOOL INC: $6,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFLINT HILLS VOLUNTEER CENTER INC: $5,600 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S CROSSING ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Housing and Credit Counseling Inc ↗
  • Who funds BE ABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLINT HILLS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds NO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE CAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK GROVE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FLINT HILLS VOLUNTEER CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable · Memorial Hospital Association Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation · Daniel Keating Foundation · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Global Impact · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Konza United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Konza United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Konza United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph