· Public charity
Konza United Way Inc
Our mission is to create long-lasting changes by addressing underlying causes of community problems relating to health, education and income.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $177,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $200,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $137k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC | $40,000 |
| ATA BUS | $25,000 |
| CRISIS CENTER | $24,000 |
| SUNFLOWER CASA PROJECT INC | $20,000 |
| FLINT HILLS BREADBASKET | $15,000 |
| BOYSGIRLS CLUB | $13,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH MINISTRY | $9,000 |
| KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES | $8,500 |
| PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH | $8,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $8,000 |
| BE ABLE INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +115%
- CCCRISIS CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $257k · revenue +89%
- FHFlint Hills Area Transportation Agency9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- THTHE HOUSE CAFE INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +37%
- OGOAK GROVE SCHOOL INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -90%
- FHFLINT HILLS VOLUNTEER CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.
To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ
To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.
Care Beyond the Boulevard (CBB) provides quality medical care, case management, and respite services to the homeless, uninsured, and vulnerable people of Greater Kansas City.
Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
The organization owns and operates a skilled nursing facility for the elderly and disabled in Frankfort, Kansas.
Provide affordable housing to low-income families
Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pony Express Partnership for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S CROSSING ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Housing and Credit Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds BE ABLE INC ↗
- Who funds FLINT HILLS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PONY EXPRESS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds FLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC ↗
- Who funds NO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE CAFE INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC ↗
- Who funds OAK GROVE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FLINT HILLS VOLUNTEER CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable · Memorial Hospital Association Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation · Daniel Keating Foundation · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Global Impact · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Konza United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.