Skip to content
Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc

We believe in the uniqueness, dignity, and potential of every life.

$708k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$393kReligion$153kRecreation & Sports$106kHuman Services$93kFood & Nutrition$89kYouth Development$76kEducation$76kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $284,418, the rows itemized in this filing. The $708,013 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $423,595 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$11,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
(6) KEVIN YORK$59,934
(9) PHILLIPS HEALTHCARE$44,856
(13) SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC$30,319
(3) CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GEORGIA$20,000
(8) MONASTERY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT$20,000
(11) PREGNANCY AID CLINIC$16,007
(4) EMPOWER CHEROKEE OF GA$14,052
(5) GREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$11,000
(12) PUTNAM COMMUNITY RESOURCES$11,000
(15) WHISPERING HOPE WOMEN'S$10,750
(10) PORCH DE SALOMON CORP$10,000
(14) WARRIORS TO LOURDES$10,000
(2) BENEDICTINE PRIORY OF SAVANNAH$10,000
(7) KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA$10,000
(1) ATLANTA VIETNAM VETERANS BUSINESS$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%(15) WHISPERING HOPE WOMEN'S: $11k → 4%(3) CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GEORGIA: $20k → 8%PREGNANT CHOICES: $6k → 13%AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $42k → 13%DREAM MAKERS YOUTH FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
CT
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$507k · 12 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$507k
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-13%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitHealthReligionRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOLBE CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $67k · revenue +30%
  • EC
    Empower Cherokee of GA Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $56k · revenue +50%
  • PA
    PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $49k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PM
    PROBO MEDICAL LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $132k
  • CF
    COATS FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2024 · $71k
  • AW
    AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $42k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
2
Center for Pregnancy Choices of Simpson County Inc

Provide resources, counseling, and support for mother-to-be.

Human Services
3
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
6
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
7
The Pregnancy Center Inc

To assist women with unplanned pregnancies.

Health
8
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
9
A Womens Care Center

Our mission is to provide services to women with unplanned pregnancies in a compassionate and respectful environment

Health
10
First Choice Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc

Provide services and support to persons regarding crisis pregnancies.

Human Services
11
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Help Center of Artesia

Offer free pregnancy counseling

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Aid Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Council On Accreditation Parks Recreation Tourism and Related Pro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROBO MEDICAL LLC: $131,975 · OtherPROBO MEDICAL LLCMONASTERY OF THE HOLY GHOST INC: $73,608 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY GHOST INCCOATS FOR KIDS: $70,963 · OtherCOATS FOR KIDSEmpower Cherokee of GA Inc: $56,054 · OtherEmpower Cherokee of GA IncPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC: $49,034 · OtherPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INCPHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION: $44,856 · OtherPHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,156 · Other+20 more: $194,488 · Other+20 moreSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $105,904 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLY…AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $41,600 · Human ServicesAMERICAN …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …WHISPERING HOPE WOMENS RES AND PREG CTR: $10,750 · Human ServicesWHISPERIN…PREGNANT CHOICES: $5,548 · Human ServicesPREGNANT …Dream Makers Youth Foundation Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesDream Mak…KOLBE CENTER INC: $67,363 · HealthHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC: $10,271 · HealthCOUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO: $59,934 · EducationKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC: $40,336 · PhilanthropyGREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $28,800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$646,134Recreation & Sports$105,904Human Services$83,398Health$77,634Education$59,934Philanthropy$40,336Food & Nutrition$28,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC: $105,904 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKOLBE CENTER INC: $67,363 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO: $59,934 over 1y, 96% of budgetEmpower Cherokee of GA Inc: $56,054 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC: $49,034 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $41,600 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC: $40,336 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $28,800 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHISPERING HOPE WOMENS RES AND PREG CTR: $10,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC: $10,271 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEWTN NEWS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANT CHOICES: $5,548 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDream Makers Youth Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJohns Creek Veterans Association: $5,043 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLBE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO ↗
  • Who funds Empower Cherokee of GA Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds WHISPERING HOPE WOMENS RES AND PREG CTR ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EWTN NEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Touch Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANT CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds Dream Makers Youth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Johns Creek Veterans Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Georgia Power Foundat…Knights of Columbus C…Morgan Stanley Global…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home