Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc

We believe in the uniqueness, dignity, and potential of every life.

$708k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES OF GEORGIA INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $284,418 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $708,013 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $423,595 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$11,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
(6) KEVIN YORK$59,934
(9) PHILLIPS HEALTHCARE$44,856
(13) SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC$30,319
(8) MONASTERY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT$20,000
(3) CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GEORGIA$20,000
(11) PREGNANCY AID CLINIC$16,007
(4) EMPOWER CHEROKEE OF GA$14,052
(12) PUTNAM COMMUNITY RESOURCES$11,000
(5) GREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$11,000
(15) WHISPERING HOPE WOMEN'S$10,750
(14) WARRIORS TO LOURDES$10,000
(2) BENEDICTINE PRIORY OF SAVANNAH$10,000
(10) PORCH DE SALOMON CORP$10,000
(7) KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA$10,000
(1) ATLANTA VIETNAM VETERANS BUSINESS$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%(15) WHISPERING HOPE WOMEN'S: $11k → 4%(3) CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GEORGIA: $20k → 8%PREGNANT CHOICES: $6k → 13%AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $42k → 13%DREAM MAKERS YOUTH FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
CT
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$507k · 12 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$507k
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitHealthReligionRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOLBE CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $67k · revenue +30%
  • EC
    Empower Cherokee of GA Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $56k · revenue +50%
  • PA
    PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $49k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PM
    PROBO MEDICAL LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $132k
  • CF
    COATS FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2024 · $71k
  • AW
    AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $42k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
2
Center for Pregnancy Choices of Simpson County Inc

Provide resources, counseling, and support for mother-to-be.

Human Services
3
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
6
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
7
The Pregnancy Center Inc

To assist women with unplanned pregnancies.

Health
8
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
9
A Womens Care Center

Our mission is to provide services to women with unplanned pregnancies in a compassionate and respectful environment

Health
10
First Choice Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc

Provide services and support to persons regarding crisis pregnancies.

Human Services
11
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Help Center of Artesia

Offer free pregnancy counseling

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Aid Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Council On Accreditation Parks Recreation Tourism and Related Pro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%4%<5yr17%13%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr9%13%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%22%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr9%27%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/29
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROBO MEDICAL LLC — $131,975 · OtherPROBO MEDICAL LLCMONASTERY OF THE HOLY GHOST INC — $73,608 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY GHOST INCCOATS FOR KIDS — $70,963 · OtherCOATS FOR KIDSEmpower Cherokee of GA Inc — $56,054 · OtherEmpower Cherokee of GA IncPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC — $49,034 · OtherPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INCPHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION — $44,856 · OtherPHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient — $25,156 · Other+20 more — $194,488 · Other+20 moreSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC — $105,904 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLY…AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION — $41,600 · Human ServicesAMERICAN …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …WHISPERING HOPE WOMENS RES AND PREG CTR — $10,750 · Human ServicesWHISPERIN…PREGNANT CHOICES — $5,548 · Human ServicesPREGNANT …Dream Makers Youth Foundation Inc — $5,500 · Human ServicesDream Mak…KOLBE CENTER INC — $67,363 · HealthHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $10,271 · HealthCOUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO — $59,934 · EducationKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC — $40,336 · PhilanthropyGREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $28,800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$646,134Recreation & Sports$105,904Human Services$83,398Health$77,634Education$59,934Philanthropy$40,336Food & Nutrition$28,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC — $105,904 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKOLBE CENTER INC — $67,363 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO — $59,934 over 1y, 96% of budgetEmpower Cherokee of GA Inc — $56,054 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC — $49,034 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION — $41,600 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC — $40,336 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $28,800 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC — $10,271 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEWTN NEWS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANT CHOICES — $5,548 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDream Makers Youth Foundation Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJohns Creek Veterans Association — $5,043 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds KOLBE CENTER INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON ACCREDITATION PARKS RECREATION TOURISM AND RELATED PRO
  • Who funds Empower Cherokee of GA Inc
  • Who funds PREGNANCY AID CLINIC INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES USA INC
  • Who funds GREENE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds WHISPERING HOPE WOMENS RES AND PREG CTR
  • Who funds HANDS OF HOPE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds EWTN NEWS INC
  • Who funds PORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION
  • Who funds Mary's Touch Inc
  • Who funds PREGNANT CHOICES
  • Who funds Dream Makers Youth Foundation Inc
  • Who funds MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE USA INC
  • Who funds Johns Creek Veterans Association

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Charities of Georgia Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph