Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kluver-Moore Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$235kFood & Nutrition$200kArts & Culture$130kPublic Benefit$125kEducation$123kReligion$73kHealth$70kEnvironment$63kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$15,000
PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY$15,000
MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$10,000
GARDENS ON SPRING CREEK$10,000
FOOD BANK TASTE BENEFIT$10,000
POUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS$10,000
RESPITE CARE$10,000
CASA OF LARIMER COUNTY$10,000
SUMMITSTONE HEALTH PARTNERS$10,000
SAINT$7,500
POUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST$7,500
OPEN STAGE THEATER$5,000
FORT COLLINS SYMPHONY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RESPITE CARE: $10k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $10k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $8k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $8k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$843k · 14 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$843k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+21%

Still filing today

71%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionReligionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +45%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +189%
  • SH
    Summitstone Health Partners
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +221%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY GIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOUN
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
The Pinon Project

The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.

Human Services
3
Larimer Consensus Group Inc

Larimer Consensus Group, Inc. shall be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes to combat community deterioration, unemployment, poverty, racial discrimination; to provide opportunities for quality housing,…

Philanthropy
4
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
5
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
6
Philanthropy Colorado

Philanthropy colorado is a nonprofit membership association for grantmakers throughout the state. its mission is strengthen colorado communities by bringing people, information and resources together.

Philanthropy
7
Colorado Springs Philharmonic Foundation

To raise funds and acquire assets, both real and personal, that will provide financial assistance to the Colorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra.

Arts & Culture
8
Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc

The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…

Arts & Culture
9
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
10
Pikes Peak Community Foundation

To inspire a passionate community to forge an enduring legacy now and for future generations. this mission is attained by building a community endowment, helping donors address community needs and providing philanthropic leadership.

Philanthropy
11
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
12
Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra

The mission of the boulder philharmonic orchestra is to enrich connections and communities through the power of orchestral music. the boulder philharmonic orchestra presents performances that reflect our community's values, creativity, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is OpenStage Theatre and Co Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY GIVE: $125,000 · OtherCITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY GIVECOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC: $80,000 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INCSAINT: $57,500 · OtherSAINTMUSEUM OF ART: $50,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF ARTFort Collins Symphony Association: $40,000 · OtherFort Collins Symphony AssociationOPEN STAGE THEATER: $35,000 · OtherOPEN STAGE THEATERGARDENS ON SPRING CREEK: $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK: $22,500 · OtherPOUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST INC: $42,500 · OtherPOUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST INCPOUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS: $40,000 · OtherPOUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS+6 more: $45,000 · Other+6 moreThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $160,000 · Food & NutritionThe Food Bank fo…PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $105,000 · ReligionPROJECT SE…POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSummitstone Health Partners: $70,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentRESPITE CARE INC: $50,000 · Human Services
Other$567,500Food & Nutrition$160,000Religion$105,000Education$80,000Health$70,000Youth Development$60,000Human Services$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $105,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetPOUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetSummitstone Health Partners: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY: $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRESPITE CARE INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPOUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST INC: $42,500 over 8y, 13% of budgetPOUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS: $40,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetFort Collins Symphony Association: $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK: $22,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOpenStage Theatre and Co Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC ↗
  • Who funds POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Summitstone Health Partners ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RESPITE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds POUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds POUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS ↗
  • Who funds Fort Collins Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OpenStage Theatre and Co Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO26.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · United Way of Larimer County · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Don & May Wilkins Charitable Trust · Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Denver Foundation · The Griffin Foundation Inc · Poudre Valley Health Care Inc · Realities for Children Charities · The Food Bank for Larimer County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kluver-Moore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kluver-Moore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kluver-Moore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph