How much did KLUVER-MOORE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of KLUVER-MOORE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $25k
$10k–50k10 grants · $110k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$182k

Total assets

Largest grants

FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$15,000
PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY$15,000
FOOD BANK TASTE BENEFIT$10,000
SUMMITSTONE HEALTH PARTNERS$10,000
MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
CASA OF LARIMER COUNTY$10,000
POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$10,000
GARDENS ON SPRING CREEK$10,000
RESPITE CARE$10,000
POUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS$10,000
SAINT$7,500
POUDRE RIVER LIBRARY TRUST$7,500
FORT COLLINS SYMPHONY$5,000
OPEN STAGE THEATER$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$830k · 13 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$830k

$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+3%

Still filing today

54%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationFood & NutritionReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FB
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY
8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +37%
SH
SUMMITSTONE HEALTH PARTNERS
7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +204%
RC
RESPITE CARE
7× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +254%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY GIVE
one grant, 2022 · $125k
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +66%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER
one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Denver Public Library Friends

Builds support and raises money to expand the denver public library's programs and services.

Education

Public Land Solutions

Public land solutions is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing comprehensive recreation planning and stakeholder coordination to support effective and sustainable public land solutions.

Environment

Pueblo Community College Foundation

The Foundation will provide awareness and funding in supporting the advancement of student scholarship opportunities and programs of academic excellence at PCC.

Education

Colorado River Land Trust Inc

Preserving land and water quality in the colorado river basin for future generations

Environment

Social Venture Partners Boulder

To harness the collective power of nonprofits and philanthropic changemakers to accelerate community impact.

Philanthropy

Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition

Boulder Public Library Foundation

The boulder library foundation increases funding for services that help the people of boulder develop and grow by raising money, increasing awareness, advocating for the library, and encouraging community involvement.

Education

Friends of the Loveland Public Library Foundation Inc

Supports the Loveland Public Library's work as the information center of the community by advocating for the public support and use of the Library, by generating current and long-term funding, and by developing volunteer involvement.

Education

Rise Colorado

Work to educate, engage and empower low income families and families of color to end educational inequality in our public school system.

Education

United Way of Pueblo County

To serve as a trusted community leader by leveraging resources in support of collaborative solutions.

Philanthropy

Pikes Peak Community Foundation

Community trust to promote philanthropy in the pikes peak region.

Philanthropy

Great Falls Public Library Foundation

The great falls public library foundation solicits, receives and provides stewardship of donations from the public to be used for the benefit, improvement and welfare of the great falls public library and its patrons, as a supplement to…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Poudre Wilderness Volunteers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

7/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$585,000Food & Nutrition$160,000Religion$105,000Education$80,000Health$70,000Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$42,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation · United Way of Larimer County · Community Foundation of Northern · Louis and Anne Abrons Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KLUVER-MOORE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: POUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~26 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 841333391 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on POUDRE WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 26 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 27% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Kluver-Moore Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kluver-Moore Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KLUVER-MOORE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kluver-Moore Foundation?

More from the funding graph

KLUVER-MOORE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kluver-Moore Foundation?

More from the funding graph