Skip to content

· Private foundation

Klinck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$104kEducation$84kHuman Services$63kInternational$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kHousing & Shelter$33kFood & Nutrition$29kYouth Development$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,270
Median grant
16
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF RGV$4,800
UNIV OF TEXAS LONGHORN FOUNDATION$4,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,000
GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$4,000
SALVAATION ARMY$4,000
BUCKNER FOUNDATION$3,700
BOY & GIRLS CLUB OF MCALLEN$3,500
UT RGV KENNETH BURFORD ENODWED SHOLARSHIP UT PAN AMERICAN$3,400
HILLSDALE COLLEGE CHARTER SCHOOL$3,300
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,960
M D ANDERSON$2,400
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION-SOUTH TEXAS$2,200
FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN$2,000
CONFORT HOUSE$2,000
ASPCA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $2k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $1k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 33%FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $3k → 14%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $800 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 33%FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $2k → 14%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $796 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 33%FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $2k → 14%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $700 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 33%FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $2k → 14%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $694 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 33%FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $2k → 14%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $618 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 33%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $1k → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $618 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 33%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $700 → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $500 → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 33%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $700 → 10%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY: $450 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WI
MI
NY
SD
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$525k · 67 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

67 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
8

Total granted

$525k
$5k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationArts & CultureMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +4%
  • BF
    BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +120%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • GP
    Globe Proprties Inc-UT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • MC
    MERCY CORPS
    one grant, 2017 · $629
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
4
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
5
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF TEXAS LONGHORN FOUNDATION: $35,400 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS LONGHORN FOUNDATIONFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC: $29,007 · OtherFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INCSALVAATION ARMY: $26,450 · OtherSALVAATION ARMYUT RGV KENNETH BURFORD ENODWED SHOLARSHIP UT PAN AMERICAN: $25,112 · OtherUT RGV KENNETH BURFORD ENODWED SHOLARSHIP UT PAN AMERICANHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $24,639 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYBoys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc: $22,839 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of McAllen IncAMERICAN RED CROSS: $20,012 · OtherM D ANDERSON: $19,036 · OtherHILLSDALE COLLEGE CHARTER SCHOOL: $14,046 · Other+61 more: $168,249 · Other+61 moreGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $23,712 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN C…BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $23,120 · Human ServicesBUCKNER FOUNDATI…HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10,425 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTINFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $9,780 · Human ServicesFOR LOVE OF CHIL…TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC: $6,176 · Human ServicesTEXAS BURN SURVI…+2 more: $2,710 · Human ServicesTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC: $8,965 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,302 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,929 · HealthScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $6,180 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,700 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS JUVENILE DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $1,477 · HealthHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $11,052 · Membership BenefitTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $10,065 · Public Safety & DisasterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,552 · InternationalAUSTIN FREE-NET: $5,940 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,100 · Education
Other$384,790Human Services$75,923Health$37,553Membership Benefit$11,052Public Safety & Disaster$10,065International$8,552Education$8,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC: $29,007 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $23,712 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $23,120 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc: $22,839 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $11,052 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $10,425 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOONLIGHT FUND INC: $10,372 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $10,065 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $9,780 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC: $8,965 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,552 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,302 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,929 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $7,570 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $6,180 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC: $6,176 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN FREE-NET: $5,940 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHI SIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION INC: $4,430 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION: $2,882 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,780 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,310 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,129 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS JUVENILE DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $1,477 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $16 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc ↗
  • Who funds Health Alliance for Austin Musicians ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds MOONLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Scott & White Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN FREE-NET ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHI SIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seven Cities FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seven Cities Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · San Antonio Area Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klinck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klinck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Klinck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph