Skip to content
Klimkiewicz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Klimkiewicz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MEducation$188kHuman Services$69kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$5kInternational$5kAnimals$5kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fanconi Cancer Foundation$225,000
Langley Residential Support Services$10,000
Make-A-Wish Greater Virginia$10,000
EQUI-Kids Therapeutic Riding Program$5,000
CHKD$5,000
Dogs on Deployment$2,000
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia$1,500
D-FEET Cancer$1,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,000
Dolphin Scholarship Fund$1,000
Chesapeake Regional Medical Center$1,000
Chesapeake Bay Foundation$500
Aid Another Ballers Basketball$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 6%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$1.5M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+63%

Still filing today

88%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $745k · revenue +23%
  • KI
    KIDZ1STFUND INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $425k · revenue +35%
  • CH
    CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $181k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAPE HENRY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • MG
    MAKE-A-WISH GREATER VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
2
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services
3
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…

Health
4
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
5
Families of the Wounded Fund Inc

Families of the wounded fund, inc (fotwf) provides financial assistance to families of service members or us agents who were wounded in combat or injured in support of combat operations while the wounded receive treatment at various…

Human Services
6
Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation Inc

See schedule othe marine corps scholarship foundation is the nation's oldest and largest provider of need-based scholarships to military children. founded in 1962, the marine corps scholarship foundation provides access to education for…

Education
7
Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services
8
Captain Erick Foster Memorial Ride

Team foster raises money to partner service dogs with tri-state area veterans suffering from combat-related disabilities, including post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd) and traumatic brain injury (tbi). see schedule o for continuation. we…

Public Benefit
9
Carteret County General Hospital Foundation

To assist carteret general hospital in providing the best possible healthcare to the people of carteret county through fund raising programs that support community based programs, purchase of vital equipment, capital expansion, renovations…

Philanthropy
10
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
11
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
12
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is KIDZ1STFUND Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $745,000 · HealthFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATIONKIDZ1STFUND INC: $425,000 · HealthKIDZ1STFUND INCChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $60,500 · Health+3 more: $29,000 · HealthCAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $180,500 · EducationCAPE HENRY CO…+2 more: $7,600 · EducationLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $65,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CAPE HENRY FUND: $33,000 · OtherGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $15,000 · OtherD-FEET Cancer: $2,601 · Other+14 more: $9,100 · OtherDogs on Deployment: $4,500 · Animals+1 more: $100 · AnimalsFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $3,500 · Food & NutritionCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · Environment
Health$1,259,500Education$188,100Human Services$66,500Other$59,701Animals$4,600Food & Nutrition$3,500Environment$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $745,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetKIDZ1STFUND INC: $425,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $180,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $60,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEqui-Kids Therapeutic Riding Program: $15,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA: $13,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDogs on Deployment: $4,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOLPHIN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe River Ellis Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHESAPEAKE GENERAL HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDARE COUNTY ASSOC OF FIRE OFFICERS: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hampton Roads Communi…The Pfizer Foundation…Dominion Energy Chari…AbbVie FoundationThe Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Hampton Roads Community FoundationVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hampton Roads Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klimkiewicz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klimkiewicz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Klimkiewicz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home