Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

KJ Middleton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$71kHuman Services$66kYouth Development$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$655k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Carolina Tiger Rescue$10,000
Boys Town of Nebraska$5,000
NC Fallen Fire Fighters$2,500
USO of NC$2,500
Corral Riding Academy$2,400
VFW$2,000
DAV$2,000
Corolla Wild Horse Fund Inc$2,000
Military Missions in Action$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Green Beret Foundation: $6k → 16%Green Beret Foundation: $5k → 16%Green Beret Foundation: $5k → 16%Green Beret Foundation: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$198k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -100% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$198k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-100%

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CAROLINA TIGER RESCUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +30%
  • GB
    GREEN BERET FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +37%
  • OS
    Operation Second Chance Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $19k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • PH
    P2 HOLDING
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Waterfowl Rescue Inc

Carolina waterfowl rescue cares for injured and orphaned wildlife. the goal is to return all rehabbed animals to the wild, or when necessary find appropriate permanent homes for the animals that cannot be released.

Animals
2
Carolina Wildlife Rehabilitation Center

Our organizations main purpose is the rehabilitation of injured/orphaned wildlife.

Environment
3
Carolina Wildlife Conservation Cent Er

Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate and release injured, orphaned and ill local wildlife. we focus on wildlife conservation education so that people and animals can live in productive harmony.

Animals
4
Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc

Southern Comfort Animal Rescue, Inc. is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that rescues and rehomes abused, unwanted and abandoned companion animals.Southern Comfort was founded in 2001 in Savannah, Georgia, to provide shelter and find…

Animals
5
Appalachian Wildlife Refuge

Rescue and Rehabilitation of wild animals in Western North Carolina

Animals
6
Carolina Raptor Center Inc

Environmental stewardship, education, research, and rehabilitation of injured birds of prey

Animals
7
Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services
8
Nc Dog Rescue Organization
9
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
10
Promoting Animal Welfare in North Carolina

Our main program is providing vet care to animals dropped at or rescued from the local animal shelter. This is the only service we provide and where our expenses go. We spay/neuter animals adopted from the shelter and provide vet care to…

Animals
11
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
12
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation and the most unlike its peers is P2 Holding. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boys Town of Nebraska — $27,000 · OtherBoys Town of NebraskaUSO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC — $25,500 · OtherUSO OF NORTH CAROLINA INCNC Fallen Fire Fighters — $13,100 · OtherNC Fallen Fire FightersDAV — $8,025 · OtherDAVVFW — $8,025 · OtherVFWP2 HOLDING — $3,000 · OtherCorral — $2,962 · OtherCAROLINA TIGER RESCUE — $60,000 · AnimalsCAROLINA TIGER RESCUECOROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INC — $4,000 · AnimalsCOROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INCKAREN BEASLEY SEA TURTLE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER — $3,375 · AnimalsAMERICAN WILDLIFE REFUGE INC — $3,225 · AnimalsOperation Second Chance Inc — $18,500 · Public BenefitOperation S…MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC — $2,000 · Public BenefitMILITARY MI…GREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $19,500 · Human ServicesGREEN BERE…THE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY — $4,400 · Education
Other$87,612Animals$70,600Public Benefit$20,500Human Services$19,500Education$4,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAROLINA TIGER RESCUE — $60,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetUSO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC — $25,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $19,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc — $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY — $4,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAREN BEASLEY SEA TURTLE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER — $3,375 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetP2 HOLDING — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAROLINA TIGER RESCUE
  • Who funds USO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc
  • Who funds THE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY
  • Who funds COROLLA WILD HORSE FUND INC
  • Who funds KAREN BEASLEY SEA TURTLE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN WILDLIFE REFUGE INC
  • Who funds P2 HOLDING
  • Who funds MILITARY MISSIONS IN ACTION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization KJ Middleton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to KJ Middleton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to KJ Middleton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph