Loading…
· Private foundation
KIWANIS FOUNDATION OF ROCKVILLE
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$10k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants
2
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of KIWANIS FOUNDATION OF ROCKVILLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2022 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$830
Median grant
2
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MANSFIELD KASEMAN$1,800
- MONTGOMERY COLLEGE$1,800
- KIWANIS CHILDRENS FUND$1,000
- MANNA FOOD$830
- NOURISH NOW$830
- A WIDER CIRCLE$830
- GAITHERSBURG HELP$830
- STEPPING STONES$830
- DWELLING PLACE$500
- MC COALITION HOMELESS$500
- SECOND CHANCE WILDLIFE$500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 28% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
12
Total granted
$48k
$13k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+6%
+49%
Still filing today
55%
17%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IWINTERFAITH WORKS4× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +32%
- GHGAITHERSBURG HELP3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +98%
- NNNOURISH NOW2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +288%
Funded once
- MOMEALS ON WHEELSone grant, 2021 · $2k
- STSHEPHERDS TABLEone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -47%
- MCMONT CTY COALITION HMLSone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc
The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.
—
2
Nourishing Bethesda Inc
Fighting food insecurity in our area by providing nutritious food and community support to our neighbors in need, as well as offering and linking our clients to wraparound resources that will enable them to build healthy and stable lives.
Human Services
3
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc
We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. In 2022 230 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals to 238 clients. We are mission-focused growth-oriented and committed to serving our community.
—
4
Manna On Main Street
Manna on main street is committed to ending hunger in the north penn region by providing food, fulfilling social service and education needs, and conducting community outreach. through a food pantry and soup kitchen, emergency financial…
—
5
Moveable Feast Inc
Improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and deliveringmedically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and health equity.
—
6
Miriam's Kitchen
To end chronic homelessness in the district of columbia.
Human Services
7
Our Place Waldorf Inc
Our Place Waldorf provides residents in need in Charles County, Maryland with nutritious food in a welcoming, open, and friendly environment.
Food & Nutrition
8
Friendship Place
Friendship Place is a leader in the Washington, DC, metro area in developing solutions to homelessness that have measurable results and a lasting impact. Friendship Place's mission is to empower people who are experiencing or at risk of…
Housing & Shelter
9
End Hunger in Charles County Inc
To eradicate hunger in Charles County MD
Human Services
10
Many Hands Inc
Many Hands leverages the power of collective giving to support nonprofits serving and empowering Washington, DC area women, children, and families in socioeconomic need.
Philanthropy
11
Food for Others Inc
The mission of food for others is to distribute food to our neighborsin need by mobilizing our giving community and volunteers.
Human Services
12
Arlington Community Food Bank
The Arlington Community Food Bank's mission is to help end hunger in our community at its root cause.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Works and the most unlike its peers is Kiwanis International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$36,390Philanthropy$17,000Religion$4,550Food & Nutrition$3,580Education$3,330
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
William S Abell Foundation IncMD16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: William S Abell Foundation Inc · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Charles and Margaret Levin · Adventist Healthcare Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation KIWANIS FOUNDATION OF ROCKVILLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE DWELLING PLACE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 521558475 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE DWELLING PLACE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Kiwanis Foundation of Rockville?
Find your warmest path to Kiwanis Foundation of Rockville through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines