· Public charity
Kiwanis Club of Bradenton Inc
To practice the high principles and ideals of kiwanis international and to further the common good and general welfare of the people of manatee county, florida.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $162,012 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $262,109 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,097 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $101k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMS | $52,000 |
| FLORIDA CULTURAL GROUP INC | $20,000 |
| KIWANIS CHILDRENS FUND POSSIBILITIES PROJECT | $20,000 |
| KIDS AGAINST HUNGER-MANATEE COUNTY | $15,000 |
| EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF MANATEE COUNTY | $13,000 |
| GUARDIAN ANGELS OF SW FLORIDA INC | $13,000 |
| LPGA TOURNAMENT PROP ONE LLC | $10,000 |
| MANATEE COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MANATEE RIVER FAIR ASSOCIATION | $9,012 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFlorida Cultural Group Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $143k · revenue +507%
- GAGUARDIAN ANGELS OF S W FLORIDA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +22%
- MCManatee County 4-H Association Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- MCMANATEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-PLAYGROUND PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $784k
- PCPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +42%
- HFHope Family Services Incone grant, 2022 · $64k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preventing child abuse, restoring healing, and strengthening all children and their families through advocacy, treatment, and shelter.
The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
To help build our community by providing educational tools, food, closing, and a safe place for underprivileged and at-risk youth in manatee county, florida
Service club supports children who reside in manatee county by raising and distributing funding for the benefit of those who are in need of food, shelter, clothing, health services, or educational services.
To practice the high principles and ideals of kiwanis international and to further the common good and general welfare of the people of manatee county, florida.
Legal representation of children.
To provide homes for disadvantaged children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manatee County 4-H Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Strength in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MANATEE COUNTYINC ↗
- Who funds Florida Cultural Group Inc ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds Hope Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds MANATEE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN ANGELS OF S W FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Manatee County 4-H Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF MANATEE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRENGTH IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds PALMETTO YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Manatee River Fair Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PLUS OF MANATEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Manatee Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · It Works Gives Back Foundation Inc · The Mary Parker Foundation 157823-000 · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Bradenton Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hope Family Services Inc — 40% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc — 0% of income from government
- Manatee River Fair Association Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.