Loading…
· Private foundation
THE MARY PARKER FOUNDATION 157823-000
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$8.1M
Granted FY2024
—
Grants
—
Communities
—
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of THE MARY PARKER FOUNDATION 157823-000’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
manateechildren
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Grant detail is referenced in an attached schedule not included in the e-file. Total reported in the filing: $8,139,156.
$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$196M
Total assets
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
University of Florida
To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.
Education
2
Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness
As lead agency for the sarasota/manatee continuum of care, suncoast partnership collaborates with providers of services and housing for those who are homeless and those at imminent risk of homelessness. we receive and distribute grants,…
Human Services
3
University of Florida Alumni
Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…
Education
4
Florida Research Center for
Philanthropy
5
Florida Institute for Human
To provide information-technology research, education, scientific advancement, and economic development as it relates to the combination of human and machine cognition and artificial intelligence.
Science & Tech
6
Save the Manatee Club Inc
Manatee protection and preservation.
Animals
7
Suncoast Humane Societyinc
Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…
Animals
8
BayCare Health System Inc
Baycare health system, inc. will improve the health of all we serve through community-owned health care services that set the standard for high-quality, compassionate care.
Health
9
Manatee County Historical Commission Inc
To preserve and promote manatee countys heritage and history.
—
10
Florida Surveying and Mapping
—
11
Suncoast Workforce Board Inc
The organization's mission is to identify and invest in workforce development solutions to meet the needs of manatee and sarasota counties.
Employment
12
University of Miami
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manatee Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Manatee River Pram Fleet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$18,681,262Housing & Shelter$145,000Education$100,000Philanthropy$75,000Health$10,000Human Services$7,500Animals$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANATEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST ↗
- Who funds MANATEE RIVER PRAM FLEET ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HAVEN FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds CENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds WE CARE MANATEE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTRIDE THERAPY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation of Sarasota CoFL22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Edward E & Lillian H Bishop Fdn 007087-000 · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE MARY PARKER FOUNDATION 157823-000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Centerstone of Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 650458897 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Mary Parker Foundation 157823-000?
Find your warmest path to The Mary Parker Foundation 157823-000 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines