· Private foundation
Archarios Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| SCARLET ROAD | $5,000 |
| TEEN TALKING CIRCLES | $5,000 |
| NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE | $5,000 |
| HELPLINE HOUSE | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HOJA NUEVA | $5,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC | $5,000 |
| VILLAGE HOPECORE INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY WOMENS CHORUS | $5,000 |
| LAURAS HOUSE | $5,000 |
| CRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY | $4,000 |
| GIRLS BUILD | $4,000 |
| NORTHWEST STONE SCULPTORS ASSN | $4,000 |
| BAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONE CALL FOR ALL7× · 2018–2025 · $47k · revenue +87%
- VHVILLAGE HOPECORE INTERNATIONAL7× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +38%
- LHLAURA'S HOUSE8× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- KSKAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +182%
- COCITY OF HOPEone grant, 2023 · $5k
- SEShalem Early Childhood Learning Communityone grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
Building on community creativity and inspiration, we mobilize resources to improve parks and trails on bainbridge island.
The institute for bird populations enables science-based conservation of species and habitats by studying the abundance, demography, and ecology of birds and other wildlife.
The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.
Fostering sustainable shellfish resources and a healthy marine environment through research and education.
Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
The principal goals of pacific seabird group are (1) to increase the quality and quantity of seabird research through facilitating exchange of information and (2) to identify and assess the importance of threats to seabird populations and…
The oregon shakespeare festival creates world-class theater, revealing our collective humanity through illuminating interpretations of new and classic plays, and inspiring a love of our art form for current and future generations.
Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anacortes Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Bainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE CALL FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HOPECORE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds HELPLINE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SCARLET ROAD ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY WOMEN'S CHORUS ↗
- Who funds Central Kitsap Food Bank ↗
- Who funds KAPPA SIGMA ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds CRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GIRLS BUILD ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST STONE SCULPTORS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Teen Talking Circles ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOODORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Bainbridge Island Arts & Humanities Council ↗
- Who funds BAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE ↗
- Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Bainbridge Youth Services ↗
- Who funds Friends of Hoja Nueva ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAGUNA BEACH ↗
- Who funds BAINBRIDGE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HELPING OUR MENTALLY ILL EXPERIENCE SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
- Who funds Battle Point Astronomical Association ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Bainbridge Island Historical Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: One Call for All · Bainbridge Community Foundation · Kitsap Community Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · Orange County Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Brown Family Private Foundation · Fred H & Mary S Dore Charitable Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · The Bianchi Family Foundation Javier Ordaz Cerity Partners
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Archarios Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.