Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kirsonis Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$732kArts & Culture$50kHealth$24kEnvironment$22kAnimals$22kEducation$19kReligion$18kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE$52,936
DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA$36,000
LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LITHUANIAN FOUNDATION$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
EASTERN SIERRA LAND TRUST$2,500
MONO COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$2,000
LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF U$2,000
THALIANS$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE INYO$2,000
LITHUANIAN ARCHIVES PROJECT$2,000
LITHUANIAN WORLD ARTS COUNCIL$2,000
DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA$2,000
SAINT CASIMIR'S CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF U: $2k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE INYO: $2k → 10%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $40k → 14%LITHUANIAN ARCHIVES PROJECT: $2k → 14%LITHUANIAN FOLK DANCE INSTITUTE: $3k → 19%LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF U: $2k → 11%LITHUANIAN ARCHIVES PROJECT: $2k → 14%LITHUANIAN EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF U: $2k → 11%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $40k → 14%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $36k → 14%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $35k → 14%LITHUANIAN FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $30k → 14%BALTIC JESUIT ADVANCEMENT: $3k → 14%MONO COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $5k → 10%BALTIC JESUIT ADVANCEMENT: $2k → 14%MONO COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $5k → 10%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $30k → 14%LITHUANIAN FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%WILD IRIS: $5k → 10%BALTIC JESUIT ADVANCEMENT: $2k → 14%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $5k → 10%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $30k → 14%BALTIC JESUIT ADVANCEMENT: $2k → 14%MAMMOTH HOSPITAL: $5k → 10%MAMMOTH HOSPITAL: $5k → 10%DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA: $25k → 14%MONO COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $3k → 10%SAINT CASIMIR'S CHURCH: $5k → 14%MONO COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $3k → 10%SAINT CASIMIR'S CHURCH: $3k → 14%SAINT CASIMIR'S CHURCH: $3k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $74k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $60k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $53k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $46k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $40k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $39k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $37k → 14%LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $34k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $15k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $15k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $7k → 14%LITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$949k · 39 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
4

Total granted

$949k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+21%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $266k · revenue +41% · 29% of their budget
  • LF
    LITHUANIAN FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +97%
  • TT
    THE THALIANS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • NF
    NMDP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +21%
  • CR
    CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN PERMACULTURE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • ML
    MALIBU LOST HILLS SHERIFFS FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2019 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lithuanian World Center

To promote and preserve lithuanian culture and heritage.

—
2
Northern California Latvian Assn

Support Latvian language and culture

Arts & Culture
3
Monimos Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Lithuanian Catholic Federation Atetis Incorporated

To support, promote and assist religious activities and projects to "renew all things in christ" through educational programs including conferences, leadership seminars, training workshops, summer camps, periodicals and other publications,…

Religion
5
Lithuanian Alliance of America

To promote lithuanian culture and education.

—
6
Lithuanian Opera Co

To Promote Lithuanian Language Culture.The Lithuanian Opera Company of Chicago was founded by Lithuanian imigrants in 1956 and presents operas in Lithuanian . It celebrated fifty years of existence in 2006 , and operates as a…

Arts & Culture
7
Mltpa Foundation

To plan, steward, interpret, promote, and sustain a system of four-season trails and public access to natural areas in the Mammoth Lakes and Eastern Sierra Nevada region in the state of California while protecting its natural resources.

Environment
8
American Latvian Association in the Unit

The american latvian association (ala) is the main representative organization for the latvian american community. through 100 member organizations, churches, clubs and some 4,000 individual members we represent over 90,000 people of…

Arts & Culture
9
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
10
Lithuanian Catholic Academy of Sciences Inc

Operation and maintenance of museum and library of the lithuanian catholic academy

Religion
11
Mammoth Lakes Friends of the Library

Support collection development and public programs at the Mammoth Lakes Branch Library.

Education
12
Lithuanian American Club Inc

Cultural & Religious Meetings

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mono Lake Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lithuanian Melodies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPE: $383,305 · OtherLITHUANIAN CHILDREN'S HOPEDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA: $266,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LALITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY: $82,100 · OtherLITHUANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY+33 more: $161,550 · Other+33 moreLITHUANIAN FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC UNBOUND: $4,500 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $2,250 · Arts & CultureLITHUANIAN MELODIES INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureEASTERN SIERRA LAND TRUST: $8,500 · EnvironmentFriends of the Inyo: $5,250 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAY: $4,000 · EnvironmentACCESS MAMMOTH: $9,500 · EducationDRAUGAS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · ReligionLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterBALTIC AMERICAN FREEDOM LEAGUE INC: $3,400 · International
Other$892,955Arts & Culture$20,250Environment$17,750Education$9,500Religion$8,000Housing & Shelter$7,000International$3,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA: $266,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetLITHUANIAN FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $9,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THALIANS: $9,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetEASTERN SIERRA LAND TRUST: $8,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDRAUGAS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Inyo: $5,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC UNBOUND: $4,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIC AMERICAN FREEDOM LEAGUE INC: $3,400 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetCAMP DAINAVA FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetATEITIS FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMONO ARTS COUNCIL: $2,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITHUANIAN MELODIES INC: $1,500 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF LITHUANIA LA ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH ↗
  • Who funds THE THALIANS ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN SIERRA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DRAUGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Inyo ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC UNBOUND ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds BALTIC AMERICAN FREEDOM LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP DAINAVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ATEITIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONO ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITHUANIAN MELODIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lorber FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lorber Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kirsonis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kirsonis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kirsonis Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kirsonis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kirsonis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph