Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kirsch Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$402k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$3,842
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$30,516
SOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE$7,629
WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$7,629
UW-WHITEWATER$3,842
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$3,815
CAPRI COLLEGE$3,815
NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,815
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $8k → 21%NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 10%UW-WHITEWATER: $4k → 10%SOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$235k · 9 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$235k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

11%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    3× · 2020–2024 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $43k
  • NI
    NORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $37k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • NI
    NE IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • U
    UW-MADISON
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Ambrose University

Mission statement: an inclusive, catholic, and diocesan community of learners, st. ambrose university empowers all ambrosians to act courageously, to seek wisdom through faith and reason, to work for justice, and to lead lives of service.…

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
6
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
7
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
8
Briar Cliff University

Briar cliff university is a community committed to higher education within a liberal arts and catholic perspective. in the franciscan tradition of service, caring and openness to all, briar cliff emphasizes quality education for its…

Education
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mound Farm Holdings Inc and the most unlike its peers is Creighton University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $49,718 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE — $43,269 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLENORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $36,556 · OtherNORTHEAST IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $30,516 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINSOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $26,625 · OtherSOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $23,840 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $13,035 · OtherNE IOWA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN — $12,692 · OtherUW WHITEWATER — $10,915 · Other+11 more — $79,817 · Other+11 moreClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $35,976 · EducationClarke University of …MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $7,073 · EducationMARIAN UNIVERSITY INCCORNELL COLLEGE — $7,073 · EducationCORNELL COLLEGEMOUND FARM HOLDINGS INC — $5,962 · EducationMOUND FARM HOLDINGS I…LAKELAND UNIVERSITY — $5,962 · EducationLAKELAND UNIVERSITYEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC — $4,953 · EducationEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY I…UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE — $4,231 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUECreighton University — $3,815 · Education
Other$326,983Education$75,045

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $35,976 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $7,073 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL COLLEGE — $7,073 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUND FARM HOLDINGS INC — $5,962 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY — $5,962 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC — $4,953 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE — $4,231 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $3,815 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds CORNELL COLLEGE
  • Who funds MOUND FARM HOLDINGS INC
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DUBUQUE
  • Who funds Creighton University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kirsch Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph