Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$489k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$1.5MReligion$945kEnvironment$100kHealth$46k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $234k
$16,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X$100,000
RUTH SMART FOUNDATION$77,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$57,000
SPCA FOR MONTEREY COUNTY$44,402
Individual grant recipient$27,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIVERSITY COLL$22,000
SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLIGICAL SOCIETY$20,000
PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE$16,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$16,000
CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX$15,000
MAURITIAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$13,000
MUTTVILLE$12,000
SHANTI PROJECT$12,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 78% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 22% that went abroad ($578k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MUTTVILLE: $12k → 10%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $10k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $15k → 13%SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT: $7k → 15%SPCA OF WESTCHESTER: $16k → 9%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $57k → 28%CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM: $6k → 12%SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X: $225k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST PIUS X: $75k → 15%MUTTVILLE: $9k → 10%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $10k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $12k → 13%SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT: $7k → 15%SPCA OF WESTCHESTER: $13k → 9%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $50k → 28%CLEARWATER MARINE AQUARIUM: $6k → 12%SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X: $200k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST PIUS X: $75k → 15%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $8k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $10k → 13%SPCA OF WESTCHESTER: $6k → 9%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $35k → 28%SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X: $100k → 8%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $8k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $10k → 13%SPCA OF WESTCHESTER: $6k → 9%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $35k → 28%SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X: $100k → 8%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $6k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $10k → 13%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $32k → 28%CARMELITE MONASTERY: $6k → 12%CALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $9k → 13%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $32k → 28%BIG SUR LAND TRUST: $100k → 12%MIDDLEBURY INSTITUTE OF INTL STUDIE: $7k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $27k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $26k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $15k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $15k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $12k → 12%VENTANA WILDERNESS SANCTUARY: $12k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $16k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $15k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8k → 12%PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 22% of all-years giving ($578k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$471k · 8 grants
Mauritius$77k · 10 grants
JE$19k · 6 grants
Belize$11k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 25 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$2.4M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-23%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County
    6× · 2020–2025 · $285k · revenue +43%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    6× · 2020–2025 · $241k · revenue +57%
  • PO
    PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BS
    Big Sur Land Trust
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -23%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIVERSTIY OXFO
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
North Bay Animal Services
Animals
3
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
4
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
5
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
6
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
7
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
8
Santa Cruz Spca and Humane Society

The Santa Cruz SPCA provides safe harbor for animals in need and promotes an active humane community through adoption, advocacy, and education.

Animals
9
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals
10
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
11
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
12
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X SOUTH-WEST DISTRICT INC: $625,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X SOUTH-WEST DISTRICT INCRUTH SMART FOUNDATION: $429,000 · OtherRUTH SMART FOUNDATIONSOCIETY OF ST PIUS X: $150,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST PIUS XIndividual grant recipient: $107,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAURITIAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $69,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA FRIENDS OF SSPX: $66,000 · Other+13 more: $318,500 · Other+13 moreSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $284,878 · AnimalsSociety for the Prevention of C…Wildlife Conservation Society: $241,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation SocietyPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $63,000 · AnimalsPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUESPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $51,000 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INCMUTTVILLE: $25,000 · Animals+4 more: $53,500 · Animals+4 moreBig Sur Land Trust: $100,000 · Environment
Other$1,764,500Animals$718,378Environment$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $284,878 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $241,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $63,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $51,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSHANTI PROJECT: $45,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWONDER DOG RESCUE: $14,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ANIMAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds Big Sur Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHANTI PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds WONDER DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ANIMAL SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sylvanus Charitable Trust Co McGilloway Ray Brown & KaufmanCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sylvanus Charitable Trust Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman?

Find your warmest path to Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kinnoull Foundation Co McGilloway Ray Brown & Kaufman’s filings →

More from the funding graph