Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kingweseley Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$110kAnimals$39kScience & Tech$25kEnvironment$13kRecreation & Sports$7kInternational$4kReligion$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE$8,000
THE GABBY WILD FOUNDATION INC$5,000
UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHENGETA WILDLIFE USA: $3k → 14%MADAGASCAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WILD GIFTS: $1k → 7%PEREGRINE FUND: $300 → 8%LAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $25k → 11%PPBB DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $300 → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%WILDAID INC: $2k → 10%ST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $25k → 13%CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: $2k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $300 → 17%VIRUNGA FUND INC: $1k → 20%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $300 → 14%FLORIDA WILDLIFE CORRIDOR: $1k → 12%CENTRAL FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER: $500 → 13%FRAGMENTS OF HOPE: $500 → 13%SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLANDS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 13%THE GABBY WILD FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%RAPTOR TRUST: $400 → 4%MONTCLAIR STATE UNVIERSITY: $2k → 16%RHINO 911: $500 → 10%ST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $3k → 6%FRIENDS OF ZARA'S CENTER: $2k → 11%EQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE: $8k → 15%LAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $3k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY GIFT: $25k → 8%MOTHER JONES INVESTIGATIVE: $365 → 10%THE GABBY WILD FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%RARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $500 → 5%MONTCLAIRE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER: $1k → 15%LAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $2k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%AMAZON FRONTLINES: $500 → 10%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%CENTER FOR RURAL PRESERVATION: $2k → 5%UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%USHJA: $1k → 15%NATIONAL HORSE SHOW: $500 → 15%PRINCETON SHOW JUMPING: $2k → 5%NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $2k → 5%NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $1k → 5%NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $960 → 5%NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $500 → 5%NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Kingweseley Family Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kingweseley Family Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 9 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
68

Total granted

$58k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+56%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationInternationalScience & TechMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $30k · revenue +28%
  • US
    UNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +46%
  • New Jersey Audubon Society
    4× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY GIFT
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • CW
    CHENGETA WILDLIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
International Primate Protection League

Protecting the world's remaining primates by monitoring and exposing illegal trade, supporting a worldwide network of overseas sanctuaries and ngo's, publicising the plight of abused primates, and operating a sanctuary for resued gibbons.

Animals
5
Dazzle Africa

Dazzle africa's mission is to partner with local organizations to provide programs in conservation, education and community development. the organization aims to ensure that future generations are self-sufficient and iconic african…

Animals
6
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
7
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
8
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
9
Pacific Bird Conservation

To ensure the continued existence of pacific island birds that are under threat from introduced species and habitat loss.

Animals
10
Wildlife Impact

Protect wildlife and ecosystems through research, evidence-based evaluation, capacity development and advocacy.

Animals
11
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
12
The Nature Conservancy

The mission of the nature conservancy is to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildaid Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rhino 911. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/40
Grantees still filing
30/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD…LAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $29,500 · EducationLAFAYETTE COLLEGE+1 more: $2,500 · EducationSTANFORD UNIVERSITY GIFT: $25,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY GIFTST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherST JOHN'S COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $4,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+43 more: $24,615 · Other+43 moreThe Gabby Wild Foundation Inc: $15,000 · AnimalsThe Gabby Wil…CHENGETA WILDLIFE: $2,500 · AnimalsCHENGETA WILD…WILDAID INC: $2,000 · AnimalsWILDAID INCCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BI…+11 more: $3,850 · Animals+11 moreEQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE: $8,000 · EnvironmentNew Jersey Audubon Society: $3,630 · EnvironmentCenter for Rural PreservationInc: $1,500 · EnvironmentFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Environment+7 more: $2,090 · EnvironmentUNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsMADAGASCAR FOUNDATION: $2,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ZARA'S CENTER: $1,500 · InternationalSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue: $300 · Science & Tech
Education$82,000Other$78,865Animals$25,350Environment$16,220Recreation & Sports$4,000International$3,500Science & Tech$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $29,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gabby Wild Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetEQUINE LAND CONSERVATION RESOURCE: $8,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED STATES HUNTER JUMPER ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $3,630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHENGETA WILDLIFE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADAGASCAR FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetWILDAID INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZARA'S CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCenter for Rural PreservationInc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVIRUNGA FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON FRONTLINES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAHARA CONSERVATION FUND: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BONOBOS: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOUC LANGUR FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR BAT CONSERVATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealth in Harmony: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMane Stream Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPEL NONPROFITS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDMINSTER PBA LOCAL #366 INC: $100 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kingweseley Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kingweseley Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Raritan Headwaters Association: 94% of income from government
  • Pinelands Preservation Alliance: 35% of income from government
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kingweseley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph