Skip to content

· Public charity

Kingdom Development Inc

To improve the welfare of low-income households through the development of affordable housing.

$220k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$224kHealth$199kHuman Services$152kInternational$114kHousing & Shelter$74kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $169,412, the rows itemized in this filing. The $219,667 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,255 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
$12,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$162M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REBIRTH HOMES$32,000
OLIVE CREST$32,000
RIVERSIDE LIFE SERVICES$24,706
LITTLE BY LITTLE$12,706
THE GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH$12,000
THE MISSION INC$12,000
EAGLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY$12,000
SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC$12,000
WATOTO WATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY$12,000
HOPE LOCAL$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SFC SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $22k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $10k → 11%SFC SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
OR
NJ
CA
CO
NC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Kingdom Development Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 58%.

Kingdom Development Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$634k · 10 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -97% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$634k
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-97%

Still filing today

70%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    Rebirth Homes Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $101k · revenue +32%
  • SF
    SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $74k · revenue +42%
  • RD
    Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $56k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • CS
    CORNERSTONE SOBER LIVING
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
2
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
3
Save-the-Child Ministries Inc

Save-The Child Ministries, Inc. is an agency that provides abortion alternative counseling, adoption counseling, family planning counseling, crisis intervention counseling, residential care counseling, and referrals, education assistance,…

Human Services
4
Hoseas House Inc

The mission of Hoseas House is to extend the love and compassion of Jesus Christ to women & children in crisis through advocacy education housing community outreach and prayer. Hoseas House guides families in reaching their greatest…

Human Services
5
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
6
Awinjo Ministries Inc

Awinjo house is a faith-based childrens home located in tororo, uganda. our desire is to see children who are vulnerable or orphaned received into a family environment, have their emotional brokenness restored, provided a quality…

—
7
Holy Rock Outreach Ministeries Inc

The mission of Holy Rock Outreach Ministries, Inc. is to provide a comprehensive social services approach that will promote renewed hope and restoration to a families in crisis.

—
8
Homeless Paradise Inc

Our mission is to ignite a chain of hope in society through appropriate programs that make a lasting difference in the lives of the people we care and support, but building better tomorrows for them and the generations.

Human Services
9
For the Refuge

We believe there is a better way to care for at-risk children. We believe that by approaching the care of orphans, vulnerable, and at-risk children in a holistic manner, a child can leave "the system" healed from the traumas they…

Human Services
10
New Life Childrens Home Inc

Manage orphanages in the Phillipines

International
11
Marys Missionaries Inc

Mary's Missionaries is an international development and relief organization dedicated to making God's love visible by providing for the fundamental needs of people in war-torn and impoverished countries.

International
12
Pearl Ministries Inc

Pearl Ministries partners with individuals, families, and churches to help orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda, the Pearl of Africa, through gospel centered, holistic development of family and community in partnership with indigenous…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Watoto Child Care Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $77,000 · OtherTHE GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCHLIVING WAY FONTANA: $70,000 · OtherLIVING WAY FONTANAEAGLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY: $69,000 · OtherEAGLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITYIndividual grant recipient: $44,615 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $40,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYCORNERSTONE SOBER LIVING: $30,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE SOBER LIVING+4 more: $23,000 · Other+4 moreRebirth Homes Inc: $101,450 · HealthRebirth Homes IncRiverside Life Services: $54,706 · HealthRiverside Life ServicesOLIVE CREST: $52,000 · HealthOLIVE CRESTWATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY INC: $58,000 · InternationalWATOTO CHILD CAR…Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc: $56,000 · InternationalRancho De Sus Ni…SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $73,892 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FO…My Community Cares Inc: $14,615 · Human ServicesMy Community…THE MISSION INC: $22,000 · ReligionHOPE LOCAL: $8,000 · ReligionLITTLE BY LITTLE INC: $12,706 · Education
Other$353,615Health$208,156International$114,000Human Services$88,507Religion$30,000Education$12,706

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRebirth Homes Inc: $101,450 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $73,892 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY INC: $58,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRancho De Sus Ninos Inc: $56,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRiverside Life Services: $54,706 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $52,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MISSION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMy Community Cares Inc: $14,615 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE LOCAL: $8,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc ↗
  • Who funds Riverside Life Services ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds My Community Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BY LITTLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE LOCAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kingdom Development Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kingdom Development Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kingdom Development Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kingdom Development Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kingdom Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph