· Public charity
Kingdom Development Inc
To improve the welfare of low-income households through the development of affordable housing.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $169,412 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $219,667 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,255 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REBIRTH HOMES | $32,000 |
| OLIVE CREST | $32,000 |
| RIVERSIDE LIFE SERVICES | $24,706 |
| LITTLE BY LITTLE | $12,706 |
| THE GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH | $12,000 |
| THE MISSION INC | $12,000 |
| EAGLE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY | $12,000 |
| SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC | $12,000 |
| WATOTO WATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY | $12,000 |
| HOPE LOCAL | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Kingdom Development Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 58% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -97% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRebirth Homes Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $101k · revenue +32%
- SFSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $74k · revenue +42%
- RDRancho De Sus Ninos Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $56k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $45k
- FOFOCUS ON THE FAMILYone grant, 2022 · $40k
- CSCORNERSTONE SOBER LIVINGone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.
Provide safe & loving home for children
Save-The Child Ministries, Inc. is an agency that provides abortion alternative counseling, adoption counseling, family planning counseling, crisis intervention counseling, residential care counseling, and referrals, education assistance,…
The mission of Hoseas House is to extend the love and compassion of Jesus Christ to women & children in crisis through advocacy education housing community outreach and prayer. Hoseas House guides families in reaching their greatest…
Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.
Awinjo house is a faith-based childrens home located in tororo, uganda. our desire is to see children who are vulnerable or orphaned received into a family environment, have their emotional brokenness restored, provided a quality…
The mission of Holy Rock Outreach Ministries, Inc. is to provide a comprehensive social services approach that will promote renewed hope and restoration to a families in crisis.
Our mission is to ignite a chain of hope in society through appropriate programs that make a lasting difference in the lives of the people we care and support, but building better tomorrows for them and the generations.
We believe there is a better way to care for at-risk children. We believe that by approaching the care of orphans, vulnerable, and at-risk children in a holistic manner, a child can leave "the system" healed from the traumas they…
Manage orphanages in the Phillipines
Mary's Missionaries is an international development and relief organization dedicated to making God's love visible by providing for the fundamental needs of people in war-torn and impoverished countries.
Pearl Ministries partners with individuals, families, and churches to help orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda, the Pearl of Africa, through gospel centered, holistic development of family and community in partnership with indigenous…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Watoto Child Care Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds WATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc ↗
- Who funds Riverside Life Services ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds THE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds My Community Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE BY LITTLE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE LOCAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kingdom Development Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kingdom Development Inc?
Find your warmest path to Kingdom Development Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.