Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

King Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$432kHousing & Shelter$104kArts & Culture$82kFood & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$18kInternational$16kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$328k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Mary's Academy$20,000
Lewis Clark Law School$10,000
World Central Kitchen$2,011
A Chance In Life$1,538
Oregon Food Bank$1,250
Northwest Harvest$1,000
Friends of the Children$1,000
Geraldine King Women's Center$1,000
Blanchet House$1,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$1,000
Alzheimers Association$1,000
Camp John Marc$1,000
Central Catholic High School$1,000
TriCity Volunteers$1,000
Meals on Wheels$759
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TriCity Volunteers: $1k → 10%Community Help in Park Slope: $500 → 20%Catholic Charities Fort Worth: $2k → 11%Homage Senior Services: $500 → 9%A Chance in Life: $360 → 17%A Chance In Life: $2k → 17%Evergreen Health Foundation: $1k → 9%Yolo Crisis Nursery: $500 → 16%Yolo Crisis Nursery: $500 → 16%Yolo Crisis Nursery: $500 → 16%Northwest Kidney Kids: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$589k · 49 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
32

Total granted

$589k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+72%

Still filing today

39%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PORTLAND ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2017–2023 · $79k · revenue +3%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +3%
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • TP
    Transition Projects Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +99%
  • MW
    MARY'S WOODS AT MARYLHURST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +86%
  • VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

8
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
9
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
10
Second Harvest Inland Northwest

Fighting hunger, feeding hope: second harvest brings community resources together to feed people in need through empowerment, education, and partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunshine Division Inc and the most unlike its peers is Interfaith Rotating Winter Shelter of Davis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Senior Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…At-Risk Youth MentoringChild and Family ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersFaith-Based Senior LivingCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr12%26%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr19%3%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr16%57%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,379

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
35/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lewis Clark Law School — $132,000 · OtherLewis Clark Law SchoolTransition Projects Inc — $100,000 · OtherTransition Projects IncCentral Catholic High School — $80,500 · OtherCentral Catholic High SchoolST MARYS ACADEMY — $75,350 · OtherST MARYS ACADEMYCatholic School Endowment — $60,000 · OtherCatholic School EndowmentCatholic Schools Endowment Foundati — $42,800 · OtherCatholic Schools Endowment FoundatiCathedral School — $25,000 · Other+57 more — $81,278 · Other+57 morePORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $79,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND ART…+2 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $11,640 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,141 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,523 · InternationalCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $2,000 · Human ServicesA CHANCE IN LIFEINC — $1,898 · Human ServicesYolo Crisis Nursery — $1,500 · Human ServicesTRI-CITY VOLUNTEERS INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesEVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC — $500 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,600 · HealthMICHELLES LOVE — $1,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION — $750 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $2,650 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $2,000 · Crime & LegalMARY'S WOODS AT MARYLHURST INC — $3,500 · Housing & ShelterInterfaith Rotating Winter Shelter of Davis — $1,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$596,928Arts & Culture$80,500International$19,304Human Services$8,498Health$6,550Crime & Legal$4,650Housing & Shelter$4,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTransition Projects Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $79,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $11,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $9,387 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,141 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S WOODS AT MARYLHURST INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $2,516 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC — $2,318 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CHANCE IN LIFEINC — $1,898 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $1,377 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITY VOLUNTEERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHELLES LOVE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S NATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oregon Inc — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON ENERGY FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALMON FOR ALL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOLHOUSE SUPPLIES INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENTAL FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Kidney Kids Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Transition Projects Inc
  • Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MARY'S WOODS AT MARYLHURST INC
  • Who funds SUNSHINE DIVISION INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
  • Who funds THE DOUGY CENTER INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
  • Who funds A CHANCE IN LIFEINC
  • Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR35.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Clark Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization King Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Transition Projects Inc29% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Oregon Historical Society10% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum1% of income from government
  • William Temple House0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to King Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to King Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph