Skip to content

· Public charity

Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other risk factors.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$170kCommunity Improvement$41kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $87,017, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,515 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,498 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$8,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Action Partnership of Greater St Joseph$12,017
Hannibal Regional Economic Development Council$10,000
Delta Area Economic Opportunity Corporation$10,000
Missouri Parents as Teachers Association$8,750
Douglass Community Services Inc$8,750
St Louis Community Foundation Inc$8,750
Community Partnership of Southeast Missouri$7,500
Community Capital Fund$7,500
Mid America Regional Council$7,500
Community Partnership of the Ozarks Inc$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Missouri Parents as Teachers Association: $9k → 10%Douglass Community Services Inc: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Missouri Community Action

To build relationships to empower people, strengthen resilience, and improve quality of life for all members of the community.

—
2
Mid-Ozark Casa Program

The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.

Community Improvement
3
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
4
Missouri Ozarks Community Action Inc

To prepare and enable all persons to become self-sustaining, hereby enhancing the families and communities of tomorrow.

Community Improvement
5
Missouri Centers for Independent Living
—
6
Missouri Accreditation of Programs for Children & Youth

Promotion of child care excellence in missouri

Education
7
Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation

Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.

Human Services
8
Community Council of St Charles County

For over 70 years, the Community Council of St. Charles County has been dedicated to bringing people together to build stronger, more resilient communities. Our Mission is to connect nonprofits, service providers, government entities, and…

—
9
Missouri Valley Community Action Agency

To engage communities and coordinate resources to improve the lives of people experiencing poverty.

—
10
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
11
Capital Community Partners
—
12
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

Advocate for early childhood social & economic development and professionals who work with children and their families to advance this mission.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Greater St Joseph; the most unlike its peers is Missouri Parents as Teachers Association (Mopata). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
1/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Missouri Action for Kids: $170,000 · Youth DevelopmentMissouri Action for KidsCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $12,017 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTI…DELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherDELTA AREA ECO…Hannibal Regional Economic Development Council: $10,000 · OtherHannibal Regio…MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $7,500 · Community ImprovementMID-AMERI…COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI: $7,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $6,250 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…Missouri Parents as Teachers Association (MOPATA): $8,750 · Human ServicesDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8,750 · Human ServicesST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,750 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Youth Development$170,000Other$32,017Community Improvement$21,250Human Services$17,500Philanthropy$8,750Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMissouri Action for Kids: $170,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $12,017 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMissouri Parents as Teachers Association (MOPATA): $8,750 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kids Win Missouri funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kids Win Missouri. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kids Win Missouri?

    Find your warmest path to Kids Win Missouri through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kids Win Missouri’s filings →

    More from the funding graph