· Public charity
Kids Win Missouri
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other risk factors.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $87,017 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $130,515 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $43,498 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Community Action Partnership of Greater St Joseph | $12,017 |
| Hannibal Regional Economic Development Council | $10,000 |
| Delta Area Economic Opportunity Corporation | $10,000 |
| St Louis Community Foundation Inc | $8,750 |
| Missouri Parents as Teachers Association | $8,750 |
| Douglass Community Services Inc | $8,750 |
| Community Capital Fund | $7,500 |
| Mid America Regional Council | $7,500 |
| Community Partnership of Southeast Missouri | $7,500 |
| Community Partnership of the Ozarks Inc | $6,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To build relationships to empower people, strengthen resilience, and improve quality of life for all members of the community.
The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.
To prepare and enable all persons to become self-sustaining, hereby enhancing the families and communities of tomorrow.
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…
Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.
To engage communities and coordinate resources to improve the lives of people experiencing poverty.
Promotion of child care excellence in missouri
For over 70 years, the Community Council of St. Charles County has been dedicated to bringing people together to build stronger, more resilient communities. Our Mission is to connect nonprofits, service providers, government entities, and…
Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing
Advocate for early childhood social & economic development and professionals who work with children and their families to advance this mission.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Greater St Joseph and the most unlike its peers is Missouri Parents as Teachers Association (Mopata). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Missouri Action for Kids ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds DELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Missouri Parents as Teachers Association (MOPATA) ↗
- Who funds DOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND ↗
- Who funds MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kids Win Missouri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kids Win Missouri?
Find your warmest path to Kids Win Missouri through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.