· Private foundation
Key Investments Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| CHASDEI DOVID | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,300 |
| YESHIVA SPRING VALLEY | $4,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2025 · $66k
- YCYESHIVA CHOFETZ CHAIM3× · 2018–2021 · $33k
- BBMG2× · 2021–2022 · $17k
Funded once
- CCCHESED CHARTY FUND INCone grant, 2024 · $30k
- CNCONG NOAM Eone grant, 2021 · $4k
- TCTORAS CHESED INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +55%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary and high school aged children.
Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.
Provide a building for a religious school.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.
Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.
The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.
Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jsp Family Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Key Investments Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Key Investments Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Kochvei Ohr Inc: 6% of income from government
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Key Investments’ filings →