· Private foundation
Key Food Stores Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $242k
- $250k+1 grant · $672k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RANCHEROS UNIDOS FD INC | $672,400 |
| THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF THE NSA INC | $113,000 |
| FUPAC | $74,000 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $55,000 |
| NSA FLORIDA CHAPTER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL | $30,000 |
| MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| MARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BEIT HANINA CULTURAL CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF NEW YORK | $20,000 |
| ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| GRAN PARADA DOMINICANA DEL BRONX INC | $15,000 |
| THE FOOD MARKETING EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND | $10,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR FIGHTING BLINDNESS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF THE NSA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +26% · 33% of their budget
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $350k · revenue +40%- TFTHE FOOD MARKETING EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIO6× · 2017–2024 · $338k · revenue +56% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
CITY HARVEST INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%- TMTHE MARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $25k
- CFCOMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Maimonides research and development foundation was established exclusively for the educational, scientific, medical and charitable purposes carried on by maimonides medical center.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
To support cancer research, education and early detection, (cont. on schedule o)emphasizing the unique resources of italy & usa, recognizing world-class scientific excellence in medicine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund and the most unlike its peers is Hitchcocks Community Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF THE NSA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD MARKETING EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MARIANO RIVERA PUBLIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NSA FLORIDA CHAPTER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FOOD INDUSTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds FMI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEIT HANINA CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRAN PARADA DOMINICANA DEL BRONX ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE ITALIAN AMERICAN CONGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds STATEN ISLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds LEAD THE WAY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds C&S CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMFIELD CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MUSCARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Better Together - the Advantage Solutions Education Foundation · United Way of Bergen County · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Key Food Stores Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Key Food Stores Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Key Food Stores Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.