Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kevin and Nicole Systrom Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$975kScience & Tech$600kEducation$400kEnvironment$350kFood & Nutrition$115kInternational$50kArts & Culture$35kHealth$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $450k
  • $250k+2 grants · $625k
$200,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$375,000
PRIME COALITION INC$250,000
ACTIVATE GLOBAL INC$200,000
THE NUEVA SCHOOL$200,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$50,000
FOOD FOR SOUL INC$15,000
RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PRIME COALITION INC: $250k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 3 repeat orgs$560k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $325k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ACTIVATE GLOBAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $500k · revenue +67%
  • NS
    NUEVA SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $400k · revenue +19%
  • CI
    CERES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • AI
    ACTUATE INNOVATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -99%
  • BM
    BERKELEY MUSIC GROUP
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
4
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—
5
Trec Community Investors

Trec community investors joins forces with underserved communities to invest in the disinvested, energize neighborhoods, and change lives. through access to flexible capital and real estate expertise, we make an unwavering commitment to…

Human Services
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
8
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
11
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
12
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prime Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Actuate Innovation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUND…TISBEST PHILANTHROPY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTISBEST PHILANTHROPYTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITYACTIVATE GLOBAL INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentACTIVATE GLOBAL INCCERES INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentCERES INCNUEVA SCHOOL: $400,000 · EducationNUEVA SCHOOLFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $375,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTM…PRIME COALITION INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesPRIME COALI…SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $100,000 · OtherSAN FRANCI…ACTUATE INNOVATION INC: $100,000 · OtherACTUATE IN…FOOD FOR SOUL INC: $15,000 · OtherFOOD FOR S…THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherBERKELEY MUSIC GROUP: $35,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$650,000Environment$600,000Education$400,000Community Improvement$375,000Human Services$250,000Other$225,000Arts & Culture$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetACTIVATE GLOBAL INC: $500,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNUEVA SCHOOL: $400,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $375,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRIME COALITION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTISBEST PHILANTHROPY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCERES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTUATE INNOVATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKELEY MUSIC GROUP: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD FOR SOUL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kevin and Nicole Systrom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kevin and Nicole Systrom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kevin and Nicole Systrom Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kevin and Nicole Systrom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kevin and Nicole Systrom’s filings →

More from the funding graph