Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$86k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$142kHealth$134kEducation$115kHuman Services$80kPhilanthropy$22kHousing & Shelter$21kInternational$21kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $86k
$4,800
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SOUP KITCHEN$85,600
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
EVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
CARIDAD CENTER$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
ORT AMERICA$6,000
TEMPLE BETH ORR EARLY CHILDHOOD$5,000
IMMUNIZEORG$5,000
JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$4,800
NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
SAWGRASS NATURE CENTER & WILDLIFE HOSPITAL$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
SOUTH FLORIDA PBS$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$1,000
THE PAP CORPS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROSIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ROSIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $34k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $26k → 13%CARIDAD CENTER: $100k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $5k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $4k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $4k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%CARIDAD CENTER: $10k → 11%CARIDAD CENTER: $5k → 11%CARIDAD CENTER: $2k → 11%FAMILY CENTRAL: $4k → 13%FAMILY CENTRAL: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 25 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
21

Total granted

$687k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+34%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Soup Kitchen Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $228k · revenue +70%
  • CC
    Caridad Center Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $117k · revenue +88%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    7× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • VC
    VITAL CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • VG
    VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
5
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
6
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
7
Rare

Rare inspires change so people and nature thrive.

Environment
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
10
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
11
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

—
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Central Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rosies Foundation Co Glenn Zaragoza. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Soup Kitchen Inc: $227,600 · Food & NutritionThe Soup Kitchen IncCaridad Center Inc: $117,000 · Human ServicesCaridad Center IncJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $74,051 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Family Care…Rosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA: $7,500 · Human Services+2 more: $7,250 · Human ServicesORT AMERICA INC: $43,200 · OtherORT AMERICA INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $31,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODJEWISH FEDERATION: $19,400 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,500 · OtherEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANI…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $13,200 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 · Other+30 more: $46,251 · Other+30 moreThe George Washington University: $87,500 · EducationThe George Wa…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $5,000 · InternationalRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $2,000 · InternationalIMMUNIZEORG: $5,000 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,010 · Environment
Food & Nutrition$227,600Human Services$205,801Other$190,551Education$87,500International$22,500Health$8,000Environment$5,010

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc: $227,600 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $117,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetThe George Washington University: $87,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $74,051 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $43,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA: $7,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CENTRAL INC: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,010 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIMMUNIZEORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKLAND CARES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,725 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUNG JUDAEA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUSIC INC: $250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Rosies Foundation CO GLENN ZARAGOZA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMUNIZEORG ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKLAND CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORAL SPRINGS MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUNG JUDAEA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kerry & Gail Kuhn Fam Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph