Skip to content

· Public charity

Kentucky Primary Care Association Inc

The association is charged with determining and promoting the mutual interests of its members, throughout the commonwealth, with a mission of promoting access to comprehensive, community-oriented primary health care services for underserved.

$4.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $916k
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.6M
$133,973
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,360,475
PRIMARY CARE CENTERS OF EASTERN KY LLC$913,593
GRACE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$500,743
BIG SANDY HEALTH CARE INC$475,896
MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CORPORATION$353,631
HEALTH HELP INC$238,668
ONE CROSS MEDICAL CLINIC$169,261
JUNIPER HEALTH INC$133,973
FRESH START HEALTH CENTERS$100,071
STEPWORKS RECOVERY CENTERS LLC$100,070
IN HOUSE PRIMARY CARE SERVICES PLLC$71,258
FRONTIER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$51,925
BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$51,254
STERLING HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC$49,004
ARCARE INC DBA KENTUCKYCARE$46,956
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ARCARE INC DBA KENTUCKYCARE: $47k → 23%IN HOUSE PRIMARY CARE SERVICES PLLC: $71k → 5%FRONTIER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $52k → 12%STEPWORKS RECOVERY CENTERS LLC: $100k → 12%BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $51k → 15%STERLING HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC: $49k → 15%HEALTH HELP INC: $239k → 16%ONE CROSS MEDICAL CLINIC: $169k → 18%FRESH START HEALTH CENTERS: $100k → 18%PRIMARY CARE CENTERS OF EASTERN KY LLC: $914k → 27%MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CORPORATION: $354k → 29%GRACE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $501k → 30%BIG SANDY HEALTH CARE INC: $476k → 35%JUNIPER HEALTH INC: $134k → 36%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HealthFirst Bluegrass Inc

Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.

Health
2
Healthpoint Family Care Inc

To be the best provider of health services through compassion, innovation and excellence.

Health
3
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
4
Family Health Center Inc

To provide patients with the highest quality of care/services, including basic primary and preventive medical care, vision, dental, OBGYN, WIC services, and hospitalization.

Health
5
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
6
Southeast Community Health Systems

The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.

—
7
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
8
Rural Health Care Inc

To provide comprehensive primary health care and preventative health services to underserved communities. to serve individuals regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
9
Community Health Centers of Western Kentucky Inc

To provide affordable primary healthcare services in muhlenberg and logan counties, kentucky, and in medically under-served urban, suburban, and rural areas having limited available health resources.

Health
10
Henderson County Rural Health Center Inc

To provide medical and dental care to under and uninsured patients

Health
11
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
12
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Help Inc; the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands of Greenup Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,360,475 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRIMARY CARE CENTERS OF EASTERN KY LLC: $913,593 · OtherPRIMARY CARE CENTERS OF EASTERN KY LLCBIG SANDY HEALTH CARE INC: $475,896 · OtherBIG SANDY HEALTH CARE INCHealth Help Inc: $238,668 · OtherHealth Help IncONE CROSS MEDICAL CLINIC: $169,261 · Other+4 more: $322,653 · Other+4 moreGrace Community Health Center Inc: $500,743 · HealthGrace Community Health Cent…MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CORPORATION: $353,631 · HealthMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEAL…JUNIPER HEALTH INC: $133,973 · HealthJUNIPER HEALTH INCFrontier Behavioral Health: $51,925 · HealthSTERLING HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC: $49,004 · HealthARCARE: $46,956 · Health
Other$3,480,546Health$1,136,232

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG SANDY HEALTH CARE INC: $475,896 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CORPORATION: $353,631 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHealth Help Inc: $238,668 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIPER HEALTH INC: $133,973 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFrontier Behavioral Health: $51,925 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTERLING HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC: $49,004 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Americares Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kentucky Primary Care Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kentucky Primary Care Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kentucky Primary Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph