· Public charity
Kentucky Christian Foundation Inc National Christian Foundation Kentucky
Our vision is every person reached and restored through the love of Christ.
Read this first · the figures below need context
53% of Kentucky Christian Foundation Inc National Christian Foundation Kentucky’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $349,296 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $366,918 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,622 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $166k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $184k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Natl Christian Charitable Fnd | $183,741 |
| Camp GRAVES | $32,555 |
| Faithful Platform Fnd | $23,000 |
| Lexington Leadership Fnd | $20,000 |
| Young Life KY Development | $20,000 |
| Christian Family Media | $20,000 |
| Christian Student Fellowship | $20,000 |
| Refuge for Women | $20,000 |
| HOTEL Inc | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BTBy The Spirit Ministries Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $172k · revenue +222%
- YLYOUNG LIFE5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +62%
- LLLEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- HIHOPE INITIATIVE INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +4%
- HMHR MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +10%
- CCCatalyst Community Centerone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious
Religious Purposes
Church organization
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Ministry that turns men from addiction to Jesus Christ by daily engaging them in spiritual, physical and financial guidance and goals
Teach the ministry of christ
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Compassionate Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds By The Spirit Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds HOPE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP GRAVES ↗
- Who funds HR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ABIGAIL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCARLET HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds LANE OF ROSES INC ↗
- Who funds HOTEL INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds Faithful Platform Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY MEDIA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds REFUGE BOWLING GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds Iron Bell Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds LONNIE RILEY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Psalm 823 Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hope House Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Transform Scott County Inc ↗
- Who funds PRACTICAL SHEPHERDING INC ↗
- Who funds NADUS FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JOBS OF LEXINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE DAY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation · The King's Daughters and Sons Foundation of Kentucky Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kentucky Christian Foundation Inc National Christian Foundation Kentucky funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kentucky Christian Foundation Inc National Christian Foundation Kentucky?
Find your warmest path to Kentucky Christian Foundation Inc National Christian Foundation Kentucky through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.